DrChinese's latest activity

They could have chosen to work with (2), as Megidish did, but there was some technical reason they chose not to. I don't know that...

1. Again, this is precisely an issue I am attempting to gain information about. Yes, I am familiar with this being a common...

Hmmm, don't see that explicit or implied statement on re-reading your post. But whatever I saw (or hallucinated lol), I was agreeing...

It would not be fair to say case (2) does not occur, it occurs exactly (in principle) as often as case (1). And it is identified as...

Understood. I thought @Demystifier was saying that description explains the change in physics. My misunderstanding.

The Hilbert space doesn't change just because you make a measurement or perform a unitary operation. The full Hilbert space describing...

A few minor quibbles, not sure this changes anything important you are saying. a) The experiment filters/reports 4 fold coincidences...

1. That's a specific question I am asking, for which I am unsure your statement is correct. I would say entanglement is not yet...

Standard entanglement-swapping setup: two Bell pairs ##|\Phi^+\rangle_{AB} \otimes |\Phi^+\rangle_{CD}## BSM on ##BC##, measurements on...

1. I think "implies" is fair. 2. I would certainly include any automated "auxiliary random process" as being an expression of the...

You are correct about my (lack of) understanding of Hilbert spaces. So I gladly defer to you. However, your explanation doesn't seem...

It seems to me that you fail to grasp the notion of a Hilbert space at a sufficiently abstract level. To understand it properly you have...

I am studying, will respond tomorrow. Thanks! -DrC

I am agreeing that "causes" versus "implies" is a direct result of taking on the Bohmian interpretation as you do. Again, in my view...

I would say that the swap operation implies the A/D entanglement. The difference is that "implication" is logical rather than physical...