DrChinese's latest activity

If you think (1) and (2) are merely the same state, written differently outside of and in the absence of an intermediate BSM: I can't...

I think that may be tripping up some folks. To a certain degree, that is one of the issues of this thread: Demystifier raised the issue...

It seems there is not a common agreement on what the + sign means in this equation, whether it represents a coherent superposition...

I think you mean "as" Ma's? I agree with your post.

1. Are you looking at the paper? I copied and pasted directly from Ma's (1) and (2)! Not really sure how many times I need to repeat...

I said I wasn't going to comment back further to you, and yet here I am... :smile: It is right. Correcting your verbage, which I hope...

Regarding PHYSICS, what are now the consequences in doing the "analysis"? :wink:

1. Hmmm... I directly quoted Ma et al. Since I agree with those pioneering experts: yes I meant to say what I wrote. 2. I agree this is...

1. PeterDonis: Projector required... 2. PeterDonis: Projector not required. And the answer is: 1. I will not comment further back to...

We discussed this paper in an earlier thread. I don't think we reached any consensus about it.

You cannot be serious. The RHS is not an algebraic refactoring of the LHS, period. The LHS is before the swap. The RHS (with E for...

1. Great, thanks all around for saying this. 2. Of course I saw @Morbert's earlier post, in which he made the same assertion without...

Not everyone would see this as a downside. 😉

1. I agree with this. 2. The various authors would say 2 and 3 enter the BS in the state you call "singlet", even though a polarization...

Working with an interpretation that includes an arrow of time is more intuitive for us, given that we are accustomed to the concept of...