Recent content by eben51

here we go, I did some looking and found a story that explains kind of what I've been thinking... http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/080211-mm-dark-unification.html

When I get a little time I will read some of the papers. However I would like to make a few quick comments. I don't think any of the math has been working out 100%, I believe no matter what theory we look at we can find a few flaws in math. Theses satellite anomaly is a good example of that...

...to add, I know people here hate personal opinions on this forum, but personally I don't think there is dark matter, I think we're missing something and due the fact science hates to go back on ideas (speaking in General), its going to be very hard for new ideas to come out. Many scientists...

From the wiki site you link too... Well, that kind of sounds like inertia although it’s not directly said on the site.

Ok let me see If I clarify this…. Scientific American did an interview with Pedro Ferreira, from University of Oxford . The Title of the interview was, Tweak Gravity: What If There Is No Dark Matter? Link is here [PLAIN]...

Wait most of science is speculative, for example dark matter can't be proven as of yet it's speculation. The bases of me ask this was from a real interview that appaired in Scientific American (link in first post). Basicaly a comment in the story when talking about if there is no drak matter...

Sorry if the frist post was vague.. Energy is conserved so none is loss... that's kind of what I was getting at, is all the energy really conserved, has that been proven or is what we just believed for years and years, and we take this for granted? Cause it would seem with pioneer anomally...

kind of a slow fourm huh

So just a thought that popped into my head, and I wanted other peoples opinion on it. What if a fundamental law in science is not quite right, I was thinking about the first law of motion. I realize that sounds stupid, but I was reading an article about dark matter… Link and excerpt bellow…...