Recent content by Eric Hentschel

Its an equal an opposite reaction and passing kinetic energy to the object even changing and using the edge of the mass's field as where the object began its trajectory is what I am using to reference as a starting point.

I included the word angle to indicate its force was taking the object of the straight trajectory! Instead of trying to convey my ideas of the subject at this juncture, I will just ask you if there is a curvature in space time how can the object not be experiencing any energy. The object is...

Yes , I am familiar with that but my question is essentially can we calculate the rate that the magnitude decrease due variables which are limited to the objects of 3 dimensions such as gravity of a nearby mass pulling it on an angle losing some of the force. Think of it in terms of hypnosis for...

with relevance to quantum gravity they led fail to find the correlation between gravitys range and magnitude in relation to the other three forces. How have physicist take into account that gravitational forces one has to be exerted on three-dimensional objects which will experience reresistance

Sorry, I can see how the wordings confusing. Does gravity act only the center of the small mass or the entirety of it. could it be concentrated solely on the center and the rest of the mass follow suit. But either way I see gravity losing a lot of its magnitude due to three-dimensional...

I am just very curious if anybody could help me figure out which dimensions actually entail energy and matter axis. Also since colors are absorbed are there residual colour energies if so is there a known half-life? Any feedback would be greatly appreciated, thank you.

Gravity has such a long range and such a weak magnitude . Might it be due to the fact that it's acting on the three-dimensional vehicle as a mode exerting its force this way gives limitations, its inability to conserve energy due to friction resistance among others. Also is gravity applied...