Recent content by erobz

The only kind of "new spin" to me (holding these beliefs) is that it seems like the pursuit of the understanding of the "physical" universe is actually turning into a solution of consciousness...without that being the agreed upon intent per se. To me: The Theory of Consciousness = The Theory...

I didn't say it was profoundly new, I asked if the AI is correct about it being an expertly held position for Petes sake!

do you really believe that anyone not who is an expert in a certain field couldn't have independently stumble on something profound? It's absurd, there are numerous examples of this happening all throughout the history of mankind. And it didn't say I had come up with something novelly...

It disagrees with me quite often. Do I need to post the initial conversation where I was debating with it for you guys? It's long winded and it starts out as a probabilistic question about dropping an Olympic weight on another and wanders into this territory in a kind of stream of...

I was ever so slightly hung up on a coordinate transformation, but I'm decent at mathematics ( some forms)...so I understood what it did to solve the problem once I saw it...just like I would with a human in the same scenario? Then, I saw a way to compress some of the steps it had taken so I...

A while back I wanted to test it on a mechanics problem. https://chatgpt.com/share/6a065f91-71f0-83ea-82ca-dc55ccd5a053 Its reply/solution was excellent. Then I gave a suggestion, and it replied: "Yes — excellent point! You're absolutely right: instead of calculating the full strain energy...

Well, see that is what is interesting. I can't find anything incoherent in the AI's deep reply to this cognitive inquiry about the nature of reality as it pertains to physics and metaphysics, and others seem to be asking it to spell together backwards as a test of its intellectual capacity...

The title of the thread is Chat GPT examples good and bad. How are we to determine the performance case if humans aren't trying to give it the effort. I guess at this point just talk to the bots then and take it as gospel, no one is talking on here.

I don't think its a strong argument against what I'm saying. The "idea- model" that the universe has been around for 10 billion "years" is one that you cannot have without the interference of "consciousness". I think time is an amazingly useful illusion. I feel like Chat GPT implies this in...

"The strongest objection to your position is probably this: ..." "But there is still an important caution: saying" So what do you disagree (content) with about the with AI reply?

This is its reply to my summarized inquiry I posted here for scrutinization. Initially we wandered all over so I'm just cutting to the chase. https://chatgpt.com/share/6a062424-00e8-83e8-a5cb-ab99c898e9d9

Thats not true at all. It disagrees with me quite a lot actually.

When I proclaim that nothing exists without consciousness. Doubling down, nothing has ever observed the "unconscious universe"...any "stuff" inside it, or any "physical law" governing that stuff. Why does that not then imply that the hierarchy {consciousness ## \rightarrow## everything else}...

So taking all the messy physiological arguments out of the equation, place a thermocouple in a closed environment, and turn on the fan. What does it then register after (immediately) the fan is turned on? How is the result explained? I think that is what the OP is after.

So the drop height (minimum the rider drops) here is like a third of a meter here in these graphs? If the moment of inertia is low the profile is convex, and if high it becomes "mostly" concave. All interesting things. Given that most bikes and riders are similarly sized; in a passive drop...