(Well, then you just confirmed my opinion of TEPCO. Ha, ha. ) I try to follow TEPCO's releases more than anyone else seeing as they have boots on the ground and this is their mess. And their news, when they dribble it out, has not been good in the past 24 hours regarding Reactor #3 and #4.
So let me get this straight, you are basing your comments on data from March? I am not seeing any revised April data on the link you provided.
From Yesterday:
http://english.kyodonews.jp/news/2011/04/85532.html
"Meanwhile, concern grew over the state of the No. 3 reactor at one point...
Here, quell some of the useless speculation. See press releases and Kyodo news releases.
http://enenews.com/
Reactor 4 is worsening. The contamination AND evacuation zone is expanding.
http://english.kyodonews.jp/news/2011/04/85295.html
And as to the question... they WON'T be able to end it. MAN does not have the capability. They will not be able to entomb it. They cannot tunnel beneath it (being as sea level and all). The ocean will continue to be polluted by contamination.
Core temps STABLE? What news are YOU reading. Nothing more to say about the rest of your post really. YOU clearly are not up on the news at all.
It astounds me that you would be so blase when all the evidence and data points to an ongoing, increasing disaster. And what about the potential...
Not sure i have time to dig into other threads... can you be more specific as to which one?
Ok, let us say that there is NO translation error. WHAT would a neutron beam mean in this situation? HOW would it be possible?
Here is my thought: As with TMI and Tchernobyl, all the events were in unknown territory as they unfolded. Sure, engineering and physics could explain what was happening and all, but as for where exactly things were going, that was sort up to nature after a point. It took 7 months to get...
Can someone explain what are the implications for the 13 neutron beams that have been observed at Fukushima? How are they created? What will cause more to be created?