In my life I have learned many things. I have found that the most intelligent attract the least out of enamor and witty nonsense. This isn't a bad thing. Intelligence only goes so far. Having a colleague to share in intellectual banter is one thing, but to have friends who do the same this...
Trying to develop a working BackPropagation-Code Model. I have most of the math and theory down... just having trouble with making a suitable Virtual Environment and Input-Output system for the AI... I may have to scrap the BP idea for now.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backpropagation"
I read this... Are you on the "Hippy-Lettuce"?
To be honest you need to now find three intelligent ideas in that bong-ridden head of yours to balance out that one very bad one... oh wait... 3:1... Nevermind... You are just making very vague comparisions to try and explain a very complex...
In terms of Computers and Technology, Artificial Intelligence is the next step. Now A friend of mine and I are forming a team, to say the least, to create an AI that will perform the functions and tasks requested of it. For specifics or if you are interested Private Message me. I am also...
I am curious (spoken like an academic). What "large scale structure[s]" are you speaking of?
And I do know of the gravitational lensing issue... I'm just stubborn to trust Dark Matter. Seems to me like the crackpot Æther that Aristotle created (trying hard not to offend). Another example is...
Pete and Mentz, I have to say that I love all of your comments. They are truly rational and clearly thought out.
I must say that to stay in accordance with SR and GR, Gravity does not exist without matter. Mass distorts space-time and thus gravity can be evaluated... Of course... you can look...
I am sorry to go off on a tangent with this, so here it is:
Is Modified Newtonian Dynamics a "non-mainstream" theory? Because it seems VERY convincing. Not only does it explain the galactic rotational-constant that Dark Matter has tried to do for so long, it also fits right in with normal...
If we are to only talk about "current peer-review literature" we would be failing at the number one goal of science: Curiosity. We must try and look at things differently or be doomed to make the mistakes of the past.
I understand that knowledge of current ideas is important... but to...
Well the general consensus is that the before the Big Bang the universe was a massive clump of matter and energy and was very dense. Isn't that what a black hole is? A large collection of matter and energy that is super dense... right? Tell me if I'm wrong to say that there is a HUGE common...
Hi Alan,
I do believe that there is something wrong with what you are saying. This could be due to my own beliefs, which I will relate in short order. But back to your statement, Black holes appear "invisible" because light cannot escape. This is how we detect them. They make "black...