Recent content by gfgts250

The only thing i can really see in your posts is a bunch of insinuations without arguments. I have been telling you that if you want to use statements like: "pop-science", "pseudo-arguments" you have to prove it somehow, otherwise it's nothing more than arrogant insult made most likely due to...

I've started this thread and in my original post there were no questions about quantum physics, generally only simple fact that light is quantized somehow. It was mainly YOU who directed entire discussion to what we are talking about right now - first by telling me i can't localise photons in...

I'm not quite sure but it seems to me we finally almost understood each other (by the way, I'm very interested if I had used such words in my first post, did you understood me immediately). Maybe, except this one: I haven't said i need this yet. But if it's a problem, let's clarify this: We...

Is this possible to explain such things like "multipath interpretation" (interpretation where: photon follows many paths - i guess essential to modern QP) without exceeding speed of the light (*)? I'm asking because photon or "part" of it following different path than straight line has to do it...

Not "wavelength of something" but "wavelength of moving particle". Do you have any idea what you are quoting? It was taken (directly or indirectly) from the de Broglie hypothesis about wave proprties of particles (hence mass appears). According to this hypothesis every moving particle has also...

Read all, but if you really don't have to, answer only to last part. Rhetorical questions: What effects? Do you even know what I'm talking about, what this thread is about? All i want to ask is described in my first post. If you can understand my first post (just understand what i want to...

I hope you read entire post, if not read at least LAST part. I know they are. The question is why are you trying to put in my mouths words I've never said I've clearly stated in my previous post I don't try talk about some quantum properties using classical physics framework. I'm still using...

I didn't wanted to be rude. I stand by my request rather not to include topics from quantum physics (modern quantum physics if i can say so) here, but of course i should formulate my will in a different way. My fault, sorry if i offended you. I don't want you go away (i have nothing personally...

EXACTLY! Yes, this is exactly what I'm asking for! I mean general idea is correct. Let's continue with your spherical wave spreading out from a point source. Surround this source with spherical, opaque (for this wavelength) shell. There will be no E-M radiation outside it. Now drill a little...

I didn't said I'm imagining photons as little particles. I see them as the chunks of energies. I've assumed (and that's a fact) - that outside E-M wave they have PROPERTIES of particles (size, position, etc. - we can localize them). But those properties apply also to those little waves (as you...

I have started this thread in: Physics Forums > Physics > Classical Physics. I repeat: Classical Physics. And I've done this for reason. For me classical physics includes also : black body radiation, Photoelectric effect, generally everything until the year circa 1920. Quantum nature of light...

Not exactly, but close. Your statement could be very good starting point for explanation. Let's suppose our antenna in [Pic. 2a] has radiated some finite amount of energy (it has broadcasted by short moment). This energy propagates from the source in all directions in some characteristic way...

I have two simple requests: please, read entire post first, then answer. And don't say that somone is confused just because you don't understand what he is talking about. Who knows maybe i was wrong at some point, but rather not confused. Let's start with most basic thing. My question is...

This question has been asked probably many times, and is inspired by area that appears in denominator of energy flux unit [W/m^2]. From what i have read so far, i come to conclusion, that this post should, first of all, try to explain that this question makes some sense. First thing that...