Recent content by hakon

a singularity is a place where the gravity field is infinite. which is in normal cases created by a blue star going super nova and then collapsing in on it's self, however can be created hypothetically on a smaller scale. one thing I'm not sure on, does the speed of light remain a constant...

Using a Positronium as my example. the mass of 1 electron is 9.10938291(40)×10−31 kg the mass of 1 positron is 9.10938291(40)×10−31 kg The two particles annihilate each other to produce two gamma ray photons after an average lifetime of 142 ns in vacuum. leaving behind 2 photons, whose mass is...

so your suggestion is that the photons left behind create a singularity comprised of a time warp where t=infinity rather then a singularity of gravity G=infinity.

I found which of the theories for black holes is the 1 i am basing this on. It is: A singularity in solutions of the Einstein field equations and it is one of two things: a situation where matter is forced to be compressed to a point (a space-like singularity) a situation where certain light...

i come to this conclusion based on we know that up to 2 photons are made when an electron and a positron are annihilated together, 2 photons do not have the same mass as 1 electron and a positron, atleast from figures i have seen.

for a quick recap on the things being discussed, since some have trouble following. the first question asked was about what would happen in the event of 1 black hole being combined with 1 black hole which originated from the collapsed star made of anti-matter, both being of equal proportion...

Go take that dribble else where. I am well within the boundaries of the rules of this site, which quite clearly states that people may put forward ideas, if you can show reason to disprove my hypothesis go ahead and do so. but you can't just say my argument is flawed when you your self...

here is why i say we can make a gravity field. the matter and anti-matter are annihilated completely through the use of electromagnetic fields (we don't use a singularity when using this for gravity field applications), this means we are left with photons and gravity, what we have lost is all...

well then i am basing my black hole on the one Mr Hawking believes to be the case. not the string theory since it isn't exactly rock solid yet. my point is if you can contain the resultant creation, then you might be able to direct its application, i do not know if 1. you can contain the...

yes but we start with particles which originate from matter.

My point which you fail to understand is i refer to the force gravity, and do not care wether or not you can prove that the graviton exists, i merely used the graviton as although unproven it is an easy way to explain that the force is made.as for your second paragraph, i know heaps on black...

Sir Isaac Newtons apple tree disagrees with you... Wether it is a particle or a force of the universe my point is it would need to exist in a singularity and that if there is no substance left, only energy, it must still exist in some form after matter and anti-matter combine.

a black hole is a singularity yes, but they are made when the matter condenses under its own mass, you can therefor have them be made out of matter and anti-matter as both have mass. photons as mentioned do act on space in such a way as to form gravitational forces. nobody knows weather...

just thought maybe scientists trying to solve this problem might benifit from thinking about it in reverse

ok, so the neutron makes no difference. in that case let's take 2 black holes, 1 is made up of matter and 1 is made up of anti-matter. now in effect everything gets turned into energy when the 2 meet, however according to einstein, e=mc^2, the mass of both black holes remains. however...