I agree with your points, but apparently the dichotomy lies in the fact that instead of the "accepted" value of the proton radius, the formula is supposed to use Nassim Haramein's "predicted proton radius" as I've entered here:
http://wolfr.am/9TQG9pBx
This is allegedly supposed to demonstrate...
I don't think that removing it would achieve too much as the people behind it would claim that people were "stifling the science" behind the equation.
It would be more productive to demonstrate why it is incorrect, but the problem is, that it can't even be demonstrated that it is in any way...
Thank you for your reply. I'm guessing that these kinds of ideas are so far from being actual science that it's difficult to point out concrete issues. I'm trying to find specific reasons why the Fine structure or Rydberg constants don't apply at all, but it's impossible to even conceive of...
Hi all, I'm new to the forum so I hope this is the right place to pose this question. I've managed to find answers to nearly all of the questions I've had regarding certain aspects of physics on the forums, but haven't seen this addressed anywhere.
According to Wikipedia (...