Recent content by interestedman

why don't we accept that we are in this life,and try make the most of it.this most is a very subjective issue,you could spend your life as a volunteer to help the sick and poor,or to save money for any physical ends,or try to invent something for humanity.i found the best way is not to think...

thanks guys,i am not taking any stance against science,actually the more discoveries science makes ,it only reinforces the fact that we know so little,and we can only try to explore more of what we don't know,it is our legitimate human curiosity that no one is supposed to belittle.i am only...

i have always been puzzled by the fact that when addressing core issues related to trying to disentangle what could be disentangled,to may be reach a logical sequence of explanations,i find many physicists trying to address important issues,by giving examples of phenomenon that is by far unable...

thanks foxcommander,thanks a lot ,i find your post more understandable than the others,i want to make use of this,and kindly ask you what could i read to eluminate me on the super force,and what is your opinion.

dear dr chinese,what do you mean "could have conceivably have occurred another way",thanks.

dear anderson,thanks for the reply,i am not looking for one answer rather than another,i am only asking about the cause of the laws of physics,can you enlighten me with how physics is close to an explanation,that is all,thanks.:smile:

in a written form

thanks freeman,is there any online resource for the ultimate explanation?

thank you dr chinese,i mean,the causes or the initiators ,the mother force if you like,that has caused the laws to exist?,the initial cause or determinent behing them,could these forces be relegated to a single creating force?if yes why and if no why is that.

how serious is the challenge to physics to explain the causes behind every force that we know of?and is physics trying to get over its scientists differences of approaches in this regard?

thanks mike,enlighten me with some explanations of physics,and not merely descriptions.

thanks a lot croot,can you tell which of them or both enjoy the consensus of physicists in explaining forces of physics that provides significant explanations of our world?

how has physics actually contributed in explaining the complexities of our world,what are the latest developments that have at least theoretically attempted an explanation?

can someone tell me what to read in "layman " terms ,the main differences between quantum theory and relativity?

the physical forces that is able to hold the universe together,from the massive galaxies to the tiniest electron,the all embracing physics theory of everything,how far is p;hysics close to an explanation?thanks bro:smile: