iste's latest activity

Sorry, I can't resist. :oldbiggrin:

Fair enough, that sounds similar to my criticism in the thread.

Yes, 100%. The aim of serious Bohmians and Barandesians might be partly to see if what we find intuitive can hold in quantum theory...

I'm not sure I understand what you mean by this if these values have probabilities given by the central correspondence equation of the...

Wave realism is exactly the opposite of what Barandes is going for, and his formulation can be applied to fields such that you have a...

You can call an indivisible stochastic process anything you want, it doesn't change anything about the fact it has no necessary...

What is it about the indivisible approach that attracts you though; i would have thought to our kind of perspective doesn't necessarily...

I would say that an "indivisible stochastic process" is not a stochastic process. It doesn't have the multi-time joint probabilities to...

Sure, but the quantum dictionary and the Born rule basically have the same form. The difference is kind of trivial, and I think that can...

He is just postulating their existence. There is nothing in the formalism saying that there are multi-time joint probabilities. He is...

Yes, its definitely a Kuhnian shift as it introduces something that implies a new ontology or metaphysics that didn't exist before. I...

Yes, but Barandes explicitly says that such a process exists underlying the indivisible probabilities. He is saying there is an...

No, the correspondence is between the operator formalism and a conditional probability in a manner no fundamentally different to the...

A stochastic process has to have multi-time joint probabilities. Barandes theory doesn't give you any which means that the...

I don't find anything impalatable with a stochastic picture. I think its probably the most desirable kind of hidden variable...