Recent content by jaded2112
-
J
Lagrangian with a charged, massive vector boson coupled to electromagnetism
I need to use hermiticity and electromagnetic gauge invariance to determine the constraints on the constants. Through hermiticity, i found that the coefficients need to be real. However, I am not sure how gauge invariance would come into the picture to give further contraints. I think the...- jaded2112
- Thread
- Boson Charged Coupled Electromagnetism Lagrangian Qft Symmetries Vector
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
J
Confused with this proof for the Cauchy Schwarz inequality
I found an explanation for the motivation behind minimising lambda here: (although I am not sure if it answers any doubts) https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/202406/proof-of-cauchy-schwarz-inequality-why-select-s-so-that-so-that-x-sy-wou I guess this is another way of proving the...- jaded2112
- Post #10
- Forum: Introductory Physics Homework Help
-
J
Confused with this proof for the Cauchy Schwarz inequality
Thanks for the reply. Can you elaborate on why lambda can't be a maximum? Also, i think lambda is the independent variable because it can be any complex valued number and minimising the inner product is an important part of the proof.- jaded2112
- Post #3
- Forum: Introductory Physics Homework Help
-
J
Confused with this proof for the Cauchy Schwarz inequality
Im confused as finding the minimum value of lambda is an important part of the proof but it isn't clear to me that the critical point is a minimum- jaded2112
- Thread
- Cauchy Confused Inequality Linear algebra Proof
- Replies: 11
- Forum: Introductory Physics Homework Help
-
J
Confused with this integral from Griffith's electrodynamics.
Never mind i think i got it now. Thanks for your time.- jaded2112
- Post #10
- Forum: Introductory Physics Homework Help
-
J
Confused with this integral from Griffith's electrodynamics.
Yes, it does seem more tedious but I am still confused as to why we treat Px as the origin, i.e. why do we measure the distance from the length element on the x-axis (x-L) from Px as opposed to measuring it from (0,0), where we would- jaded2112
- Post #9
- Forum: Introductory Physics Homework Help
-
J
Confused with this integral from Griffith's electrodynamics.
I understand it can be done in a way which takes advantage of the symmetry of the problem, but i was wondering how to solve it by extending the line charge from 0 to 2L rather than - L to L. I apologize if this seems trivial.- jaded2112
- Post #7
- Forum: Introductory Physics Homework Help
-
J
Confused with this integral from Griffith's electrodynamics.
Well when i was working on my soln, i drew a figure where the length of the line charge extendend from 0 to 2L which is different from the book(Griffith drew it from - L to L as you can see from the figure in my post) . So i subdivided the line into two equal x's from the mid point and...- jaded2112
- Post #6
- Forum: Introductory Physics Homework Help
-
J
Confused with this integral from Griffith's electrodynamics.
Are you saying that evaluating it over 0 to 2L would not make it symmetric? If that is the case, then if i were to say, shift the line charge L units to the right and put the limits from 0 to 2L would it be correct? I'm abit confused as to why I need to evaluate the integral by specifying the...- jaded2112
- Post #3
- Forum: Introductory Physics Homework Help
-
J
Confused with this integral from Griffith's electrodynamics.
- jaded2112
- Thread
- Confused Electrodynamics Integral
- Replies: 9
- Forum: Introductory Physics Homework Help