jeffn1's latest activity
-
Jjeffn1 replied to the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM.FWIW, this seems right to me. It seems to me the term "information" is another anthromorphic term (like "observer" and even...
-
Jjeffn1 reacted to Peter Morgan's post in the thread How do entangled particles know what the other is doing? with
Like.
Art Hobson's "Fields and Their Quanta: Making Sense of Quantum Foundations" and his previous work, going back decades, has always seemed... -
Jjeffn1 reacted to Peter Morgan's post in the thread How do entangled particles know what the other is doing? with
Like.
For a field theory, there are, in the first instance, no particles to be entangled. The idea that each record of an event in a detector... -
Jjeffn1 reacted to Fra's post in the thread How do entangled particles know what the other is doing? with
Like.
This quotation comes out insightful even in the light of today. I read this so that his intuition was and still is valid - there must be... -
Jjeffn1 replied to the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM.For what its worth, Art Hobson states, in Fields and Their Quanta, "The universe is a set of at least 25 fields, each of which fills the...
-
Jjeffn1 reacted to iste's post in the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM with
Like.
Thomas Kuhn lecture about early days of quantum physics. -
Jjeffn1 replied to the thread Undergrad Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.Does it matter that the notion of retrocausality initially attributed to the "delayed choice" experiment has largely been debunked: It...
-
Jjeffn1 replied to the thread Undergrad Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.Here is a summary of Art Hobson's view in Wigner's friend (hope okay to post--feel fee to ignore): Physicists like Art Hobson view the...
-
Jjeffn1 replied to the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM.My impression: He highlights that the pre-detection state is non-local. He stresses repeatedly that failure to accept this...
-
Jjeffn1 replied to the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM.At some point I would like to start (or participate in) a thread dedicated to Art Hobson's views in Fields and their Quanta and his...
-
Jjeffn1 reacted to bhobba's post in the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM with
Like.
Physics degrees come in a number of flavours. General physics degrees are often done in a double major with applied math. This can... -
Jjeffn1 reacted to Roberto Pavani's post in the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM with
Like.
I can have an opinion based on the standard probabilistic interpretation, but I am more interested in the actual experimental outcome... -
Jjeffn1 reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM with
Like.
But you're preventing that by confining everything to a narrow tube after the aperture. In wave terms, the tube would act like a waveguide. -
Jjeffn1 reacted to Roberto Pavani's post in the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM with
Like.
Back to the original wave-versus-particle discussion: Consider the following modified double-slit experiment. A narrow vertical aperture... -
Jjeffn1 replied to the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM.I am sorry I interfered with the more detailed discussion you are having. At some point (after your technical discussion is concluded)...