JesseM's latest activity
-
JJesseM replied to the thread Undergrad Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.And would you say the statement about dynamics factorizing prior to recoherence doesn't depend on any choice of how we divide the world...
-
JJesseM replied to the thread Undergrad Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.Sure, but my intent was not to generalize to ordinary measurements. I'm just curious about what an interpretation like Barandes' would...
-
JJesseM replied to the thread Undergrad Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.As I suggested in my first comment to jeffn1, to make a Wigner's friend thought experiment a bit more realistic we could imagine a large...
-
JJesseM replied to the thread Undergrad Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.Do you mean the answer to whether a division event happens at a particular moment (when Wigner's friend makes a measurement) can change...
-
JJesseM replied to the thread Undergrad Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.I wasn't suggesting any retrocausality, if you look at Sean Carroll's discussion of the delayed choice quantum eraser which I linked, he...
-
JJesseM replied to the thread Undergrad Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.I think the difficulty with assuming definite truths about recorded outcomes that happen in the box has to do with scenarios where the...
-
JJesseM replied to the thread Undergrad Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.Is there any notion of an objective truth about what a maximally exhaustive list of division events in a given region would look like...
-
JJesseM replied to the thread Undergrad Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.My understanding is that the main reasons physicists don't see decoherence as fully resolving the measurement problem are that (1) it...
-
JJesseM reacted to Morbert's post in the thread Undergrad Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM with
Like.
Section 3.7 in https://arxiv.org/pdf/2302.10778 outlines how. It is very closely related: If a system has become correlated with its... -
JJesseM replied to the thread Undergrad Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.Is it possible to summarize how they fall out of the formalism? Is it a variant of decoherence? Could one take a description of wave...
-
JJesseM replied to the thread Undergrad Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.Does the choice of which physical facts at which moments are division events have to be "put in by hand" so to speak rather than...
-
JJesseM replied to the thread Undergrad Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.So each non-Markovian realizer would be a specific hypothesis about what the configurations are doing (at least in a probabilistic...
-
JJesseM reacted to Morbert's post in the thread Undergrad Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM with
Like.
Here's what Barandes says specifically: "Given just the minimalist ingredients that define a given indivisible stochastic process, there... -
JJesseM replied to the thread Undergrad Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.Is that because the interpretation is designed to be compatible with any one of a family of more specific possible hypotheses about the...
-
JJesseM replied to the thread Undergrad Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.Thanks--also on the comment by jbergman above that "particle paths are not necessarily continuous", there were also some comments on the...