Recent content by lawrencepatriarca
-
Undergrad Can the "measurement problem" just be an "epistemological ambiguity"?
It seems to me that we observe definite outcomes - something can be described as a definite outcome, more precisely - only and only if we are related to an established perspective, an established frame of reference. for example: even at the quantum level we observe definite outcomes, if we...- lawrencepatriarca
- Post #10
- Forum: Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
-
Undergrad Can the "measurement problem" just be an "epistemological ambiguity"?
Maybe. But one could argue that the pre-existing philosophy of science (hardcore deterministic realism so to speak) was deeply flawed and QM simply forced us back to a more sophisticated "kantian" approach.- lawrencepatriarca
- Post #5
- Forum: Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
-
Undergrad Can the "measurement problem" just be an "epistemological ambiguity"?
isn't premise 2 an acceptable definition?- lawrencepatriarca
- Post #3
- Forum: Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
-
Undergrad Can the "measurement problem" just be an "epistemological ambiguity"?
Premise 0: sorry for the wall of text, I know it might seem like I'm posting a theory rather than asking a question, but I wanted to make my thought clear Premise 1: This is not a TOE question; simply, it is the hypothesis that the "measurement problem" might not be a "real problem" at all. It...- lawrencepatriarca
- Thread
- Measurement problem
- Replies: 15
- Forum: Quantum Interpretations and Foundations