Matterwave's latest activity

No, one might not expect this behavior. The interaction for the strong nuclear force is very different than the weak interaction which...

It usually helps immensely in describing a scenario by drawing it. Even a very basic one. :)

It's difficult to do this since basically any amount of energy will kick the neutrino to relativistic speeds (##E\gtrsim m\lt...

Regarding neutrino masses: it's worth noting that Neil Turok et al. (https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08930) have proposed a cosmological...

Epistemological :)

For a modern treatment of GR, differential geometry would provide the broader perspective. You can learn SR without much of that...

Technically, yes, this is possible. My understanding is that it's considered extremely unlikely, because whatever mechanism makes the...

To be fully technical, it is still possible that one of the neutrino mass eigenstates is 0. All we constrain with oscillation tests are...

No, they don't: Please don't post contradictory statements. Also, nonzero neutrino masses do not "suggest" that they do not travel at...

You just love taking tests that much? 😂

That's only correct for a free particle, i.e., zero potential. That's not the case in your example; you have a potential confining the...

It's right to be suspicious here since that's just the free Hamiltonian. Where did the "in a box" constraint go? Hint: boundary...

That's true. I haven't computed the actual deltas from the energy eigenstates the OP is using, but of course that could be done to see...

I fully agree with the rest of your post. My only concern was about the quoted part. But even purely in QM, the generalized uncertainty...

You can't argue anything from an uncertainty relation where one of the factors is zero. That breaks the math.