Matterwave's latest activity

Until we can experimentally measure those concepts (intelligence, consciousness, thoughts, and emotions) then indeed science...

I can post a more complete answer later today if nobody else has done so already by then but it'll be a while.

This is not true in general, if it were so you'd have ##\partial_x \partial_y f =0## generically and it's obviously not generically true...

Ah, I've read this one, but I still need to sit with it a while longer.

J. S. Bell, "The theory of local beables", Epistemological Lett. 9 (1976). Lucas.

Could you reference the paper title?

I have the same feeling. There is much discussion about this, since the "locality" assumption that Bell defines in his 1964 paper is...

There are a few different threads of discussion coalescing here, so let me try to address each of them. I agree. But I'm also ok to...

Brukner neither references Englert, nor uses the word "event". And I guess neither does he implicitly use that concept. Englert himself...

Could it be a language or translation issue? Could what we are reading as "violation of Bell's theorem" have been meant to say...

Although I'm fully on board with the "operationalist" view, I agree that some passages in Englert's text are somewhat problematic...

I was going to say one bond at a time but…

See the remainder of my post where I quote most of the rest. :) Englert seems to confuse violations of Bell's inequalities with...

The point of Englert is that Bell's theorem only applies to theories "similar to Bohmian mechanics" in suitable ways: In such theories...

I disagree with several things Englert writes, but I suppose the most egregious one is claiming "...the [Bell's] theorem is wrong". He...