Morbert's latest activity

From the paper: ##\psi## and ##\phi## are rendered as such throughout. Is this a formatting error?

The (strongly modified) submitted version is here. A poster for a conference next week in Vienna summarizes everything on one page.

A paper some people might find interesting: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25335 Froehlich's work has come up a few times here (E.g...

There's the ETH interpretation of QM. ETH stands for events, trees, and histories, but I suspect it is a nod to ETH Zurich.

CH is not about what the reality is, but about what we can say about reality. It is a development and formalization of the Bohr's...

I've touched on SSR occasionally here, as it's useful for understanding MWI and locality. But the issues SSR addresses are not issues in...

There can be different groupings depending on criteria, and Omnes and Griffiths are often grouped together because of their focus on...

Omnes does not give ontic significance to histories. So e.g. if you have two histories: one where a particle has x spin-up before it is...

My language was clear. If you take issue with it, be specific. Griffith's account is not a Copenhagen perspective at all, as he...

I'm not sure if what the author calls "Many-Worlds variant of CH" is distinct from Many-Worlds, where choice of "history space" is a...

The formalism of CH aligns with a few different interpretations. David Wallace uses it heavily when presenting the Many-Worlds...

It has reproducibility problems...

Now you're charging him with not "promoting" a distinction, and you're contriving a misreading. I don't know if there is much substance...

He shows we can interpret quantum systems as systems with a definite, classical configuration, evolving unistochastically in time. The...

They are Barandes's words. They are in the correspondence paper abstract. He explicitly says "can be". I mean regular and expressible...