Morbert's latest activity

Entanglement is the quantum mechanical generalization of correlation, so within the framework of a quantum theory we can say interaction...

As an aside: There are analogous interpretational debates around special and general relativity. See e.g. substantivalist vs...

QBism, Copenhagen (Asher Peres's variety), Consistent Histories, the Oxford branch (no pun intended) of Everettianism, Relational...

There are well established interpretations with no spooky action at a distance.

I remember this paper does fields: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.18720

Barandes's correspondence is quite general. There's no reason to think it wouldn't extend to QFTs. Though it would be a worthy exercise...

https://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar?q=cache:q7yI9ZvHacYJ:scholar.google.com/+barandes+contextual+probability&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&a...

You might be thinking of a decoherence timescale/rate (see eq 5.38 in https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0105127 )

From the paper: ##\psi## and ##\phi## are rendered as such throughout. Is this a formatting error?

The (strongly modified) submitted version is here. A poster for a conference next week in Vienna summarizes everything on one page.

A paper some people might find interesting: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25335 Froehlich's work has come up a few times here (E.g...

There's the ETH interpretation of QM. ETH stands for events, trees, and histories, but I suspect it is a nod to ETH Zurich.

CH is not about what the reality is, but about what we can say about reality. It is a development and formalization of the Bohr's...

I've touched on SSR occasionally here, as it's useful for understanding MWI and locality. But the issues SSR addresses are not issues in...

There can be different groupings depending on criteria, and Omnes and Griffiths are often grouped together because of their focus on...