And I have a bunch of resources but non of the textbooks I have used note* in different languages have answered my question, if you understand why it is the way it is, I appreciate your help
Because that's how I thought myself through it, that the existence of materia is by particle, therefore if particles exist that's somehow materia. Thank you, I have understood now.
There is always an explanation to everything, the source of everything starts with thoughts- a theoretical reason for why this formula exists. And I want that so I can start to think and analyze.
Nasu, how should I take a look at it when that is the source of my problem? I need someone who can guide and explain to me so that can open up my brain
So have I understood it correctly, when the charge is passing the conductor there will be an electrical resistance . This resistance will cause it to loose half the energy used to charge a cap as you just referred. That is why we divide it by 2? But then why is the current multiplied by itself (...
If vacuum is empty with no materiaparticle then why can we not just use the relative permittivity as a reference? If there is only emptyness why can we not dismiss vaacum and only focus on relative permittivity?
But then if there are no materia particle in vacuum how can pressure exist and be...
Perhaps I used the wrong term, but I understand it from the point of Q= C x U in which it applies the formula of charge to the formula of energy and converts Q to C. So
Q= C x U --- > E= C x U^2 /2
But I want to understand it from an applied matter, right now I just see numbers and not the...