Recent content by Neutrin0

A quick little update, ive seen some of the formulas you've linked but I do have a question. Do you know if there has been any recent research on the topic? I havent been able to find much other than the links you proved. If there is i would like to compare further with my current static formula...

I thank you for the models you’ve sent, I wasn’t able to take a look at them today but I hope to tomorrow or soon. ( currently waiting on some books that’ll help me out a bit with all of this, I’ll make sure to post a response once I’ve read all the articles and gotten my books )

I see. I won’t argue against AI engineering prompts but I guess in a sense it’s just making an artists life ( and all of our lives ) easier in some way, no? Regardless AI will adapt to humans we can only hope we can keep it as a tool rather than us become a tool for it.

I was vague about my definition, sorry about that. What I classify as AI is anything made from artificial intelligence, for example a music video made completely from artificial intelligence. Or in what I mentioned people using AI to make ideas or completely using ChatGPT ( AI ) as their source...

I’ve spent nearly my entire life online, and witnessed AI become integrated into our lives. It’s clear that AI is apart of us now whether we like it or not, unless your a anti tech cabin lover. AI has some form of control over your life. But what I’ve seen very recently is that people are...

Thank you for the advice, I did take a look at my schools calc book and if I’m not mistaken it did have some of the subjects you mentioned. And if it doesn’t there are online sources that I can use in case, regardless I’ll make sure to focus on what you said first and then move onto complex...

Im currently reading mathematics for physicists by Philippe Dennery and André Krzywicki, and I’m understanding most concepts however I think it would be better for me to get a book on complex analysis or calculus to better understand it so I’m not left looking at an equation for an hour trying...

I see your point and i was very vague in my first statement. I should have said a person who is self taught will 100% need to relearn parts of the subject they are learning because it could be beyond their current knowledge, and in cases like yours where you could pick things up pretty easily...

He re explains it better my definition was over simplified.

All due respect I’d rather get answers from professionals in said field or people who know the answer to a question rather than fully relying on a AI response from google, sometimes it doesn’t explain it so it’s better to have a real person explain it in my opinion. But thank you for answering...

I was thinking about how particles collide and how we can detect it but how do we do the same for neutrinos? We can’t detect them without big water detectors and the chances of two neutrinos colliding is probably near zero but what does happen when they do collide? Do they release energy? Do...

Also since time is relative I’m assuming they also meant that a clock say on earth would be different than a clock near a black hole because of gravitational time dilation.

Im pretty sure they meant that a clock that’s outside of the event horizon as in near the black hole but not in the event horizon slow down because of gravitational time dilation which was predicted by Einstein. It’s basically time slowing down because of a gravitational source.

I like that point of view and to be honest I agree with, we all can learn differently some faster than others by book and some others by chalkboard.

I agree with you partially, if a person is fully self taught then they are 100% going to have to relearn what they taught themselves but if they actually take classes on the subject they learned they can learn more in depth and get hands on experience so say they do a 50/50, 50 they learn...