Recent content by outkast32

Ahh, i see where i went wrong :) thank you so much sir! have a good day!

hmm, because I have shown through the inductive process that 5^k+1 -1 is divisible by 4, and in the base case i took care of the n = 0 because it's not just positive integers, but all natural numbers. Should it have been therefore 5^k+1 -1 is a multiple of 4.. from the inductive process i was...

Okay i can label them, So, for the last line i should not state "therefore" i can erase that. It just seemed like i should have a therefore, after all the steps in conclusion How should i phrase it then?

Okay got it! i found a few other mistakes i think. Does this look good?: http://i.imgur.com/dtQK8Ed.jpgOr does This way look better? http://i.imgur.com/BrYvcee.jpg Anything else? Thank you so much for helping by the way :)

Thank you for the help! 1 thing, I am confused on the "base case" i understand it supposed to be "easy" and simple, do i just say n = 0? is that it? How do i write it?

Are these satisfactory answers? Question 1: http://i.imgur.com/EElOqwM.jpg Question 2: http://i.imgur.com/SlE2jza.jpg?1 Thank you :)