PeroK's latest activity
-
PeroK reacted to danieltanfh95's post in the thread AI Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with
Skeptical.
I'm saying that it is irrelevant as to whether AI is a threat or not, because the problem is on humans, not the technology. This could... -
PeroK replied to the thread AI Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.It also misses the point that AI is, by definition, an attempt to create something that is on a level with human intelligence. This...
-
No, this is the meaningless statement (emphasis added): It is not a meaningless statement to assert that AI is a threat, and it is...
-
PeroK replied to the thread AI Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.So, you are saying there is no possibility that AI could be harmful. It's bound to be advantageous, because all previous technologies...
-
PeroK reacted to danieltanfh95's post in the thread AI Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with
Sad.
Yes, which is why I am calling out the idea that "AI is the threat" as a nothingburger, because the problem is on how the human... -
Then this was a meaningless statement: According to your followup, there is no such thing as dealing with the AI. Everything is dealing...
-
PeroK replied to the thread AI Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.The threat from AI comes from the technology. It needs specific action related to the specific threat.
-
No. This is the same as with any technology. You cannot manage the risks by wholly focusing on the humans nor by wholly focusing on the...
-
I agree with this and note that the question of “intelligence” is largely irrelevant to this most important issue. It is also not...
-
PeroK replied to the thread AI Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.The issue is not only what AI can do in 2026. The issue is the speed of progress. The risk is real. And, this technology is developing...
-
PeroK reacted to Planobilly's post in the thread AI Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with Skeptical.
I've been reading this thread with interest but haven't posted because until recently I didn't have the operational experience to say...
-
PeroK reacted to wrobel's post in the thread Undergrad Is infinity a necessary concept? with
Informative.
We say that ##f(x)\to C## as ##x\to \infty## if for any positive number ##\varepsilon## there exists ##B## such that the inequality... -
PeroK reacted to berkeman's post in the thread Thanks for the welcome, but I was kicked off immediately? with
Like.
You weren't kicked off (banned). You were given a warning for the spam link you posted in your original Introduction thread, and that... -
PeroK reacted to Demystifier's post in the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM with Like.
Yes, but I would just not call such a measurement "direct". Even though the spot has the same position as the assumed particle (which is...
-
PeroK reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM with Like.
Because the branches are decohered, and because in the overall wave function you are entangled with the cat--and both you and the cat...
