Peter Morgan's latest activity
-
Peter Morgan reacted to gentzen's post in the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics with
Like.
There is a Q&A at the end, starting at 49:19, which contains stuff not contained in that transcript. Below, I collected how I tried to... -
Peter Morgan posted the thread I A Dataset & Signal Analysis Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics in Quantum Interpretations and Foundations.On May 18th, I presented a Colloquium for the School of Engineering and Physical Sciences at North South University, Dhaka, Bangladesh...
-
-
Peter Morgan reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with Like.
This is phrased rather confusingly. What you mean is that non-relativistic QM is wrong. But I don't think the OP means to restrict...
-
Peter Morgan reacted to Lord Jestocost's post in the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics with Like.
Regarding the quote from the conclusion of G. Beck's paper "How to be an orthodox quantum mechanic" (https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.20597)...
-
Peter Morgan replied to the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics.Thank you. I didn't have a copy of Ballentine available yesterday. I associate a focus on preparation as distinct from measurement...
-
-
Peter Morgan reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics with Like.
In his textbook, he gives basically the same description you quoted, but he also says that an equivalent way of looking at the quantum...
-
Peter Morgan replied to the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics.Apologies, I hadn't understood you to be espousing a minimal statistical Interpretation different from that of Ballentine. What you...
-
-
Peter Morgan replied to the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics.I had only seen v1 of that, so thank you for the push.
-
Peter Morgan replied to the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics.I think the distinction is that I see a dataset where you see an ensemble of particles. It would be only a small issue if there were...
-
Peter Morgan reacted to A. Neumaier's post in the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics with Like.
But his book is nearly as far as possible from the consensus textbook orthodoxy; see the last paragraph of p.20 in Beck's paper!
-
Peter Morgan reacted to gentzen's post in the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics with Like.
Wow, I had read Ballentine's orthodoxity measure as 0.88, but actually it is -0.88. Which makes total sense to me.
-
Peter Morgan reacted to bhobba's post in the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics with Like.
Although well thought of by many, including me, it is not an orthodox approach. That said, it is the book I recommend studying...
-
Peter Morgan replied to the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics.Certainly QFT as we have it is effective to an extraordinary degree and I have no problem with discussing asymptotic states, but I think...
-
Peter Morgan reacted to gentzen's post in the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics with Like.
If you compute the scattering between two incoming particles, or the lifetime of some excited state, then you are looking at a simple...
-
Peter Morgan replied to the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics.I would add 'Algebraic QM', which can be found in textbook form in https://arxiv.org/abs/1211.5627, by François David, (published as...
