physika's latest activity
-
physika replied to the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics.recommend read: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-relational/ ..."There is nothing in RQM that contradicts the assumption that the... -
physika replied to the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics.Your words
-
physika replied to the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics.Your interpretation of Rovelli Ok, Ok.
-
physika replied to the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics.That's is no Realism. -------------- This is Realism: ....
-
physika replied to the thread Undergrad Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.Collapse Models/Theories* https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/25/4/645 Collapse Models/Theories*...
-
physika reacted to ojitojuntos's post in the thread Undergrad Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with
Like.
Thank you! Now, these past weeks I’ve tried to take some time off work to read a bit, but in afraid that I’m far from being able to... -
physika replied to the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics.Right counterfactual definiteness (CFD) of values. ........
-
physika reacted to martinbn's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with Like.
Here is a quote from Rovelli. Taken from here https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-relational/ To me this is clear. The existence of...
-
physika reacted to PeroK's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with Like.
Note that the Rovelli paper above does not consider the question of the existence of an electron, as we have been discussing it here...
-
physika reacted to PeroK's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with Like.
How can you measure something that doesn't exist? Would two non-existent electrons be different from one non-existent electron? If...
-
physika reacted to PeroK's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with Like.
One could argue that if the electron does not exist between measurements, then it cannot be described by a state or wave-function (or...
-
physika reacted to timmdeeg's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with Like.
Sorry for a layman question in between. As I understood it a quantum object has no well defined properties unless it interacts. Isn't...
-
physika reacted to martinbn's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with Like.
But this is not denying the existence of those entities. It denies the existence of well-defined properties of those entities at each...
-
physika reacted to WernerQH's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with Like.
"Transition probability" is a somewhat misleading term, because it suggests a "thing" undergoing a transition. (Is time special?) We...
-
physika reacted to martinbn's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with Like.
Rovelli doesn't say anywhere that the quantum object doesn't exist at all times. Or can you point to where he said that. Here is the...