Recent content by rell

Hello Bob, thanks for your answer, but what do you think about my equation?

Hello, my name is Ivan and I come from Italy, so sorry for my English. I propose a simple argument that leads to the Lorentz factor. It seems to me far more orthodox (of course, I'm talking about the simplifications) of the theorem of Pythagoras to the known motion of the mirror that reflects...

Obviously, to the relativist friends, the proportion is (t1c+tiv):t2c=t2c:(t1c-t1v) I repeat, this proportion seems to me logically more right than the Pitagora's theorem, because the theorem presuppose which it should have to prove: that is the invariance of the perpendicoular dimensions to...

Yes sorry, I wrote wrong. Yes I mean your same exemple

The base of the postulate is similar to that which permits to obtain the Lorentz's contraction through the Pitagora's theorem: but the Pitagora's theorem describes the geometric aspect with concern to a perfectly perpendicular cathetus to the motion's direction, while my proportion describes the...

I tried..

Hello, I am Valentina Russo from Potenza, in Italy, and I’m a doctor. I want to ask someone who knows restricted relativity: what is there in common between the path of Lorentz and that, elementary, proposed by me, that I have summed succinctly; I am not a physicist, so I ask questions...