Roberto Pavani's latest activity
-
Roberto Pavani replied to the thread AI Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.When I said that AI is more than the sum of its parts, this is what I meant. Let's define: 1) The model + the inference engine This... -
Roberto Pavani replied to the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM.You're partially correct. The idea was that the tube walls are coated with absorbing material, so it is not intended to behave as a... -
Roberto Pavani replied to the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM.I can have an opinion based on the standard probabilistic interpretation, but I am more interested in the actual experimental outcome... -
Roberto Pavani reacted to renormalize's post in the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM with
Agree.
Why might we expect anything other than the usual single-slit diffraction pattern? After all, the light passing through your... -
Roberto Pavani replied to the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM.Back to the original wave-versus-particle discussion: Consider the following modified double-slit experiment. A narrow vertical aperture... -
Roberto Pavani replied to the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM.Please note that, in the spirit of the original topic, if electrons are replaced by photons in the double-slit experiment, the... -
Roberto Pavani reacted to Matterwave's post in the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM with
Agree.
It seems to me, that "deriving the Born rule" is a favorite pastime of MWI folks going all the way back to Everett. And a common... -
Roberto Pavani reacted to jbergman's post in the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM with
Informative.
There are critiques of this argument similar to this, see https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0312058?hl=en-US . Not sure how accepted... -
Roberto Pavani replied to the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM.TL;DR: A change of basis may simplify the representation of a problem, but the transformed variables generally do not retain the... -
Roberto Pavani replied to the thread Undergrad Is infinity a necessary concept?.I'm not sure that your ##\omega## can fit my example of ## \sin(1/x) ## -
Roberto Pavani reacted to Demystifier's post in the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM with
Like.
Are you referring to the beginning of my https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0702069 ? :smile: -
Roberto Pavani replied to the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM.Please note tha I don't think there are many wolds, but what I think doesnt'matter here. Since I'm open to any mainstream point of view... -
Roberto Pavani reacted to Demystifier's post in the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM with
Like.
In MWI, the ontic stuff is the state in the Schrodinger picture. In this sense, the Schrodinger picture is a preferred picture. In... -
Roberto Pavani replied to the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM.Going back to the original wave/particle discussion and to the picture I posted at #102, one can already view the evolution between the... -
Roberto Pavani reacted to jbergman's post in the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM with
Like.
This paper by Zurek may be a better reference. He discusses orthogonal microstates, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.71.052105
