RUTA's latest activity

I also advocate "radical empiricism," as James called neutral monism. Here is our paper on it.

This Insight is relevant. I mention Smolin's view at the end.

As in a deterministic presentism versus block universe.

There is a difference between a future that is "determined but nonexistent" and a future that "exists." In the latter case for example...

You need the settings that go with the outcomes (not the settings a nanosecond before or after), so both pieces of information are...

If information about the future measurement settings exists at the emission event where and when the particles are emitted, then the...

That's a quote from Evans' paper, but I would call dBB a "classical" ontology.

We wrote an entire book arguing for adynamical explanation over dynamical explanation ("Beyond the Dynamical Universe," Oxford UP, 2018)...

Ken is the editor of a special issue of Entropy “Quantum Theory and Causation”...

Foundations is not viewed favorably within the physics community as a whole. Quantum computing/information (QI) was only granted its own...

There are many experiments in foundations of physics. I have two explained in these Insights...

It's clear something we cherish has to go (free will or causality or locality or realism or objectivity, etc.), since QM works. So, each...

Back to the OP, I just read and would recommend this paper: Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Probabilities, and Superdeterminism.