George sir...
First of all, George sir, please suggest me some good websites to learn "The Special Relativity"...This time i want to make sure that i successfully complete this endeavor and strike at the grass root level and want to be strong at the basics of this great subject...and also...
OM SAI RAM
George sir, this is saipathudu here. Personal problems plagued my life and even before the moment of my death, my thirst to learn relativity would go on...now i came back rejuvenated, but i fear whether you will believe my words and my THIRST TO LEARN THIS AT ANY COST AT THIS...
George sir, due to personal problems, i was unable to log in sir. Please pardon me sir for not responding to your posting.
"All inertial frames agree on the spaciotemporal distance between any two events" - the proof you have given above clearly made me understood the above sentence sir.
"They...
It would help if you are quoting a post to provide a link. I hope the post uses the term "event" rather than "point" because "point" usually refers just to a spatial location, whereas "event" includes a time component.
Mr. George, in that pdf file, they were mentioning it to be points rather...
Your quote, "All inertial frames agree on the spaciotemporal distance between any two points" is correct. Your question, therefore doesn't make sense, "how come the spaciotemporal distance between any two points p and q will disagree?" I don't know why you are asking that."
George sir, please...
George sir,
It is really very nice of you to respond quickly to my query for which i need to thank you time and again.
So from your answer, i came to understand to some extent George sir. Let us consider an object table in a room. Hence that room is a frame in which the object table is...
Mr. George, let us consider three spaceships, say one at rest, second one is moving with constant velocity, and the third one is accelerating. Will all these three spaceships be IRFs? if that is the case, what about non-IRFs? can you please explain me in detail. i was really confused and unable...
Thank you Mr. Muphrid and Mr. George for helping me out in this concept. I really appreciate you both from the bottom of my heart.
Mr. George please pardon me for not interpreting your answer correctly.
I will get back to you if i get any doubts in this aspect.
Mr. George, firstly i thank you very much for spending your invaluable time to answer my question sir. With respect to the words i have bolded, how can we say that Earth is in a rest state and that it is a valid IRE. Our planet is rotating around itself and at the same time rotating the sun...
Thanks Mr. Rooted for clearing my doubt.
Since the entire universe is moving, there is no inertial reference frame or stationary point or rest frame or the one with zero velocity. Isn't it so, Mr. Rooted sir?
Hi to all,
I am a new one to this physics forum and i have a doubt regarding Inertial Reference frames.
In an article of IRF, it is given as "There is no absolute inertial reference frame, meaning that there is no state of velocity which is special in the universe."
Can anybody please...