Sambuco's latest activity

But the absolute KEY difference is what you omitted "but without the guiding nomology". I'd say the key difference is not in "hidden...

Yes, I understand. My comment, somewhat independent of @iste's opinion, is that Barandes' interpretation has the curious characteristic...

I think what @iste points out is interesting and reveals something particular about Barandes' interpretation. It's common to postulate a...

Thanks @A. Neumaier! Is this true if we limit ourselves to a single basis? I understand that the work referred to projectors associated...

For a change, let me now try to analyze the Coleman's argument by using the charity principle...

Because if you can prove it, you have solved the problem of measurement in QM and deserved the Nobel prize. :partytime:

As a quick aside, as I mentioned in post #94, Mott has nothing to do with Coleman's argument. Mott's analysis is correct, and in fact it...

As a addition to my post #92, Coleman's argument is not equivalent to what Mott presents in his seminal 1929 work. Mott demonstrates...

In case it helps, I'll share my interpretation of what Coleman is trying to say. He begins by defining the operator ##L## as having...

After some thinking, I think the Mott-Coleman argument is simply wrong, because the operator ##L## does not exist. To explain it in...

It doesn't change anything in my argument. I can define $$|\Psi_{\Omega}\rangle = |\Omega\rangle \otimes |{\rm apparatus}\; {\rm...

Within non-relativistic quantum mechanics, as you say, a tension arises between these two concepts because spacetime is assumed to be...

When I say "in relation to a third system" I'm talking about the relational interpretation, where the entanglement between two physical...

Within RQM entanglement represents the information a physical system possesses about the correlations that may exist in the outcomes of...

RQM proposes an event-based ontology, in which information is exchanged between different physical systems. However, this raises the...