Sambuco's latest activity
-
The thread topic has been sufficiently discussed, and the thread is closed. Thanks to all who participated. -
Sambuco replied to the thread A question about quantum entanglement.Interesting! I'd never thought of it that way. Lucas.
-
I think the difference here is that time dilation in SR is not an observable--it's something that's calculated by assuming a particular...
-
As an aside: There are analogous interpretational debates around special and general relativity. See e.g. substantivalist vs...
-
Sambuco replied to the thread A question about quantum entanglement.Sure, that's precisely why I said that no one is looking for an underlying mechanism to "explain" time dilation in special relativity...
-
Sambuco replied to the thread A question about quantum entanglement.Yes, and I agree that this is closely related to the fact that there is no consensus on how to reconstruct the formalism of the theory...
-
Sambuco replied to the thread A question about quantum entanglement.There is a possibility that there is no underlying mechanism that explains the phenomenon, just as there is none to explain, for...
-
In most similar discussions there is always a mess of different use of terms like local, causal, action etc. This looping part of the...
-
Sambuco replied to the thread A question about quantum entanglement.Yes, I agree. I didn't mean anything else. Objective collapse theories (GRW, CSL, and so on) are the typical example. Lucas.
-
It should be irrelevant how I or everyone else reads it. The phrase goes back to Einstein, so only the context(s) in which he said or...
-
Sambuco reacted to FactChecker's post in the thread A question about quantum entanglement with
Like.
I'll accept that. I may read more into the word than I should, and I don't want to further hijack this discussion. -
Sambuco replied to the thread A question about quantum entanglement.I believe that "established" is a reasonable word to refer to those interpretations whose predictions are considered to coincide with...
-
QBism, Copenhagen (Asher Peres's variety), Consistent Histories, the Oxford branch (no pun intended) of Everettianism, Relational...
-
Sambuco reacted to iste's post in the thread Graduate How valid is the indivisible interpretation of quantum mechanics? with Like.
I remember this paper does fields: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.18720
-
Sambuco reacted to Demystifier's post in the thread Graduate Obtaining NRQM from QFT: Issues, Folklores and Facts by Padmanabhan with Like.
Yes, but the field cannot be something that removes all the conceptual problems of NRQM. First, in NRQM the position is an observable...