Sambuco's latest activity

I was referring only to Barandes' current formulation in which, for the case of non-relativistic QM, the configurations are effectively...

We seems to partly understand each other, but just one comment on this From my perspective there is a huge difference. Yes some common...

Okay, now I understand your point of view better. Thanks for the reply! Lucas.

Not in the case where photons escape to infinity. In such a case, this... ...or its quantum analogus, is simply wrong. Photon that...

I think they are nothing more than overly idealized thought experiments that seek to understand the implications of assuming the...

Assuming the Wigner superobserver performs some recoherent operation analogous to a quantum eraser experiment: If by "Does a division...

In that case, Hobson's "interpretation" is not an interpretation, but a different theory with objective collapse, since it doesn't allow...

An interesting aspect related to this is that Barandes mentions in his conversation with David Albert that, in order to formulate the...

If we consider his proposal that, at least for non-relativistic quantum mechanics, the position of particles taking a defined value at...

As an additional comment, in an ideal case, if the system is sufficiently isolated, the limit for very long times doesn't have to be...

@JesseM Division events are nomolgical. They are features of dynamical laws. Supernatural entities like the Wigner superobserver don't...

Yes in the narrow sense that the dynamics do not supply the conditional probabilities needed to say whether or not such a transition can...

It is worth noting that Valentini's proposal is not the only justification for Born's rule within Bohmian mechanics. There is also the...

What I'm referring to is not whether or not Born's rule is used in Bohmian mechanics, but how Born's rule is demonstrated from the other...

While the proof itself, mathematically speaking, is independent of interpretation, since it only assumes universality, I get the...