Recent content by solar flex

It looks like Rearden has pulled off what I was talking about: http://www.rearden.com/DIDO/DIDO_White_Paper_110727.pdf Notice they skate around the physical description of what's going on at the RF level.

I want to thank everyone for their time and expertise. The conversation has been extremely invaluable.

Thank you, that is exactly where I was going with this.

The null is measured how, with what methodology? Using a conventional antenna perhaps?

That is exactly what I am talking about, a non inductive antenna for detecting EM waves at high enough resolution to distinguish multiple waves on the same frequency.

You said interference will be observed in the region of overlap. I am asking if that interference will be observed with a conventional antenna. I am suggesting that a non inductive method of reception could be used that would not be susceptible to the interference that a conventional antenna...

But observed how? If one is using induction for reception then there will be interference in the superpostion region. If there is a non-inductive method of reception then wouldn't it be possible to distinguish the two in the overlap region? P.S. Thanks very much for the replies!

I don't believe that is correct. In the same way that two beams from two separate flashlights pass right through each other unscathed, I believe the radio waves do as well.

No. Let me give an example. Two people with 49Mhz walkie talkies are transmitting (talking) at the same time. A third person with a 49Mhz walkie talkie won't be able to receive (hear) both of them talking simultaneously. The signals cause overlapping induction at the receiving antenna of the...

Regarding the concept of radio frequency interference, electromagnetic waves, as broadcast, never actually interfere with each other. The interference exists as interference to the induction measured at the receiving antenna. So my question is, has anyone ever tried to produce an intelligent...