Recent content by sorrybadbeat

Nice, thank you for your time.

Nice, I'll look into those. Yes, when I get the money someday I will definitely be going back to school.

I've read a universe from nothing and a brief history of time. I'm open to any new books that you may have in mind.

Haha, what are you sorry for? It's all good brother. I have a grade nine education. If you think I thought that I was going to come on here and school a bunch of physicist. You're mistaken, just thinking out loud is all. I appreciate your help. If I ask a dumb question maybe it will illicit a...

Okay, I will. Thanks, I appreciate your help.

Thank you.

"The universe is not considered as starting from some infinite particle or black hole style singularity." I was suggesting that energy exist. Atomic particles just exist and are part of nothingness, as in pre-big bang. Not nothingness as in absolutely nothing. I don't think that ever existed...

"The universe is not considered as starting from some infinite particle or black hole style singularity." Not what I was implying or rather meant to imply. I'll try and rephrase that. "The singularity in the hot big bang model is simply a point where the mathematics can no longer accurately...

From your article, this was essentially what I was talking about with the snowball theory. "The details aren’t important, but the meaning of this equation is straightforward enough: energy and momentum evolve in a precisely specified way in response to the behavior of spacetime around them. If...

I imagined a particle fragmenting a apart but the pieces gaining mass like a snowball running down a hill of snow. The hill of snow in this example being the higgs boson. My wacky imagination is getting me in heaps of trouble, lol.

Explosion, was the wrong term. Gained mass, while expanding rapidly and also becoming more disordered. I imagined an explosion in my head, so that's what I wrote. Thanks.

Maybe, I'm not understanding the second law, which seems entirely likely, but this is the exact problem my idea was trying to address. The only assumption you have to make is that energy exist, and has always existed, which coincides with the law of conservation of matter. It was my...

I misrepresented, what the early universe was - pre big bang. I thought the conditions I described were the same as the early universe, because I'm just learning about this stuff, I miss quoted a source it seems. So can we now assume, that because of the second law, all matter eventually...

If all the atoms in the universe were eventually separated far enough away from each other, so that their mass had zero effect on each other. Wouldn't the conditions for another Big Bang be met? Since that atom would represent all of the mass in the "effective universe".

What would the conditions of a universe with only one atom in it be? And how would a single atom interact with those conditions. This is where I got the super condensed ideas, sorry. "Albert Einstein came to very similar conclusions with his theory of relativity. Just consider the effect of...