syed's latest activity
-
Ssyed replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.Well you misinterpreted my "claim" since I wasn't making any novel claim. I was making the more trivial point that there is no such...
-
Ssyed reacted to Demystifier's post in the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with
Like.
@PeroK 1. In the paper https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.07575 Sec. 4.3 I have explained why the decay does not depend on details of the... -
Ssyed replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.What is the basis for the claim that if there was a deterministic theory, the atoms would not have different decay times? Why didn't you...
-
Ssyed replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.But they are not exactly identical in the sense that they are still different objects, otherwise we wouldn't say that there are multiple...
-
Ssyed reacted to Demystifier's post in the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with Like.
QM in its usual form seems to be saying that the universe is non-deterministic only when measurements are performed, while the rest of...
-
Ssyed reacted to Demystifier's post in the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with Like.
If you agree that isolated atom evolves deterministically, then non-determinism must be associated with interaction with the...
-
Ssyed reacted to Demystifier's post in the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with Like.
I don't understand your logic. Sure, a human cannot know everything there is to know about the cat and the apparatus. But just because a...
-
Ssyed replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.Your first sentence simply does not follow. By that logic, if one tosses the same coin many times, it should always land on heads if the...
-
Ssyed replied to the thread I Is there a bad intuition or bad explanation in quantum entanglement?.Well even regarding the second point, what's the difference between a "non classical" explanation and an incomplete explanation?
-
Ssyed posted the thread I Is there a bad intuition or bad explanation in quantum entanglement? in Quantum Interpretations and Foundations.I keep reading throughout this forum from many members that the general motivation for finding a deeper explanation within QM...
-
Ssyed posted the thread I Does action at a distance violate any conservation principles? in Quantum Interpretations and Foundations.In some interpretations of quantum mechanics, such as Bohmian mechanics, there is the possibility of “action at a distance,” where the...
-
Ssyed replied to the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real….And that intuition from Newton was correct as I already mentioned. There is no action at a distance. My point is just that in order to...
-
Ssyed replied to the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real….I have a degree in physics. Secondly, contrary to what you might think, many physicists don't really think about these issues as much...
-
Ssyed replied to the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real….Again, this just isn't describing the issue correctly and is a common misunderstanding. You literally cannot even test QM's truth...
-
Ssyed replied to the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real….This is not an accurate way of viewing things. It is not that we have a true quantum explanation of the world that is complete and that...