Recent content by Tiapan

I am not sure I agree totally, I believe angular momentum could be valid physical evidence, I have already given my reasons why above provided the universe rotates (at any speed). I agree apart from this we have no other observable evidence to work with, so we cannot postulate mechanisms...

Could you expand on this statement please Cheers

Similar to the open, flat or closed universe hypothesis three situations are available, only evidence will ultimately determine which of the three is correct. At present the evidence is favor of the more problematic solutions. So your "critical mass point" could be greater than, equal to or less...

Thank you Twofish for your reply. Sorry here is the abstract http://www.springerlink.com/content/t42n638233258641/" Newer data may supersede this, also the point that if there is no external reference how does one determine as an observer whether the object you are sitting on is rotating or...

I guess as the stationary observer on the outside, if such a place existed , I assumed c would apply, if we bring in GR and SR then we may observe from the inside other effects and greater speed. But the speed is not central to my argument about how and why a pre-existing angular momentum is...

If the universe is shown to have angular velocity, is this evidence of a physical universe prior to the "Big Bang"? Several studies are being undertaken currently to determine the rotational velocity of the universe. So far they have all indicated a positive velocity although the values...