Recent content by Vadim 123

Thank you for these excellent and highly relevant references! I am familiar with the direction of research they represent, and it's precisely the conceptual challenges within this framework that led me to the approach I'm exploring. The models by Visser and Liu & Lang are indeed insightful, as...

Thank you for pointing that out. You are correct to ask. This specific geometric approach is currently undergoing the peer-review process. In strict adherence to the forum's rules, I am not presenting the unpublished work itself or its derivation for discussion. My intent here is solely to...

Thank you for this exceptionally important question. It touches upon the very core of the relationship between the proposed formalism and standard Quantum Electrodynamics (QED). 1. On Planck's Constant (ħ) In this approach, the fundamental quantum scale is introduced not explicitly through...

Not quite accurate. I believe there is a simpler way to describe and explain the phenomenon of field screening and renormalization, based on geometry and without invoking additional entities like virtual photons. For example, this specific formula yields field corrections that are strikingly...

Thank you for the reference to the Born-Infeld model! It's a fascinating example of how non-linearity can regularize field energies. You are right, my question is indeed related to that direction of thought. The Born-Infeld model introduces a fundamental length scale through its parameter...

"Hello everyone, I've been studying the foundations of electromagnetism and have a conceptual question that bothers me. We know that Coulomb's law is incredibly accurate, but its standard derivation feels somewhat postulated rather than derived from more fundamental principles. Furthermore...