Recent content by Victorifrj

yes, that's what I mean. So I can say that the concept of relativistic mass is an arbitrary concept, where I make a simple equality using the gamma(Y). For this term came out of the moment P=mN(x), where N(X) is the velocity as invariant of lorents in one dimension, Nx=Yv(x). With that P=mYv(x)...

I wrote wrong: can I say Relativistic mass a quantity dependent on (v)?

In the book I'm reading he says: "We can write in aspects of classical physics defining a quantity called relativistic mass..." I understand that it is an archaic term, but this term in this equation doesn't mean anything?

I was reading a book now that confused me, it's from 2005. It has a chapter on relativistic mass, and it makes a joke of what it would be like if we calculated someone else's mass if they were moving close to the speed of light, with that we would notice a small difference in the mass of this...

If mass increases with velocity(v), can I say velocity is a quantity dependent on (v)? m=Ymo, m>mo so why can't we say that the mass (matter) increases and yes what increases is the energy to make your speed keep increasing?