he says E=mc^2 is proven.
but there is no proof(experiment) of M=E/C^2, so its not fully proved to be true.
we can turn matter into energy but not vice versa.
something like that.
so this guy who says he's a computer science major said this.
"E=MC^2 but for rigor you must prove and demonstrate M=E/C^2 as well of your proof to be complete.".
and because of that he says E=mc^2 is not fully proven.
inputs?. is he right or wrong?.
thanks.