How can I convert unit vectors from cartesian to spherical polar coordinates?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Beer-monster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The conversion of unit vectors from Cartesian to spherical polar coordinates can be achieved by inverting the transformation matrix that relates the two coordinate systems. The unit vectors in spherical coordinates, denoted as \(\hat{r}\), \(\hat{\theta}\), and \(\hat{\phi}\), can be expressed in terms of Cartesian unit vectors \(\hat{x}\), \(\hat{y}\), and \(\hat{z}\). Since the transformation matrix is orthogonal, its transpose serves as the inverse. This method allows for the determination of the unit vector in the y-direction in spherical coordinates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Cartesian and spherical polar coordinate systems
  • Familiarity with unit vectors and their representations
  • Basic knowledge of matrix operations, particularly inversion and transposition
  • Concept of orthogonal transformations in linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the transformation matrix between Cartesian and spherical coordinates
  • Learn about orthogonal matrices and their properties
  • Study the derivation of unit vectors in spherical coordinates
  • Explore practical applications of coordinate transformations in physics and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, mathematics, and engineering who require a solid understanding of coordinate transformations and their applications in various fields.

Beer-monster
Messages
285
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know where I can find what the unit vector in the y-direction would be expressed in spherical polar co-ordinates (assuming that the polar axis is along z axis)?

I can find polar unit vectors expressed in cartesians and but not the other way round?

Anyone have a clue?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
try inverting the matrix. you have the unit vectors in spherical coordinates expressed in terms of cartesian, invert the solution and you'll have it.
 
I'm sure its on the internet somewhere. You can also do it yourself, here's how:

The change of basis from [tex]\hat{x},\, \hat{y},\, \hat{z}[/tex] to [tex]\hat{r},\, \hat{\theta},\, \hat{\phi}[/tex] is orthogonal. If you know the matrix that relates one to the other, you would normally invert that matrix to find the inverse relationship. Since the matrix in your case is orthogonal, the transpose is the inverse. So just look up what [tex]\hat{r},\, \hat{\theta},\, \hat{\phi}[/tex] are in terms of [tex]\hat{x},\, \hat{y},\, \hat{z}[/tex], and then invert the matrix and the second row tells you [tex]\hat{y}[/tex] in terms of [tex]\hat{r},\, \hat{\theta},\, \hat{\phi}[/tex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K