What is the acceleration of the bowling ball in a subway car?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the acceleration of a bowling ball in a subway car that is accelerating horizontally. Participants explore the dynamics of the ball, considering forces such as weight, normal force, and static friction, while addressing the conditions for rolling without slipping.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine the relationship between the ball's acceleration and the subway car's acceleration, questioning the choice of reference frames and the implications of torque and angular acceleration. There is confusion regarding the application of the parallel-axis theorem in an accelerating frame.

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered insights into the mechanics involved, particularly regarding the choice of axes for analyzing torque and the conditions for rolling without slipping. There is an ongoing exploration of the equations of motion and the relationship between linear and angular accelerations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of using different axes of rotation and the effects of the accelerating frame on the equations governing motion. There is a noted uncertainty regarding the moment of inertia and its role in the calculations.

StephenPrivitera
Messages
360
Reaction score
0
A bowling ball sits on a level floor of a subway car. If the car has a horizontal acceleartion a, what is the acceleration of the ball wrt the ground? Ball rolls w/o slipping.
The forces that act on the ball are its weight, a normal force, and static friction. The weight and normal offset, so Friction = MA.
But if we choose the point of contact with the ball as an axis, the net torque is zero?! So since torque is zero there is no angular acceleration and thus A=0?
Something's wrong here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So it is good that you have an intuition about your answer being zero. Why not think of the reference frame as that of the center of mass of the bowling ball. Then you will have a torque acting at the radius of the bowling ball which will be prependicular to the "lever arm." So basically don't use the point of contact as your axis of rotation- it doesn't make sense to because the ball is not going to spin about that point- it will spin about it's center of mass. Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Norm
 
But if it spins about an axis, it must spin about any parallel axis. That's what's throwing me off. The angular acceleration should be the same about any parallel axis. If I use the CM as a axis, then I get F=ma, FR=Ia/R, eliminating F, I get maR=Ia/R, but then a drops out!
 
Originally posted by StephenPrivitera
If I use the CM as a axis, then I get F=ma, FR=Ia/R, eliminating F, I get maR=Ia/R, but then a drops out!
The accelerations are different and don't drop out:

[tex]F=ma_{cm}[/tex]

[tex]FR=I\frac{a_{car}}{R}[/tex]
 
There is one thing you forgot. Since the frame is accelerating, the only time that Torque = (Moment of Inertia) (alpha) is when the axis is through its center of mass. The parallel-axis theorem will not be valid in an accelerating frame of reference.

- Harsh
 
Fr=I(a_1-a_2)/r
F=ma_2
(ma_2)r^2=I(a_1-a_2)
a_2(m+I)r^2=Ia_1
a_2=Ia_1/(m+I)
I believe this to be the correct solution, and this is in the rest frame of the ground.
I'm not quite sure what to put in for I, though.
 
Originally posted by Doc Al
The accelerations are different and don't drop out:

[tex]F=ma_{cm}[/tex]

[tex]FR=I\frac{a_{car}}{R}[/tex]
I think I messed up. I believe the following is true, as the condition for rolling without slipping:
[tex]a_{cm} + \alpha R = a_{car}[/tex]

The force equations should be:
[tex]F=ma_{cm}[/tex]

[tex]FR=I \alpha=I\frac{a_{car}-a_{cm}}{R}[/tex]

With [tex]I=\frac{2}{5}mR^2[/tex]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K