What Rate Must the Magnetic Field Change to Induce a Current of 0.18 A?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a conducting loop of wire with a specified area and resistance, where a magnetic field is applied perpendicularly. The objective is to determine the rate at which the magnetic field must change to induce a specific current in the loop.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Ohm's Law to find the induced EMF and the initial magnetic flux. There is uncertainty about the interpretation of the problem, particularly regarding the need to find the final flux versus the rate of change of the magnetic field.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on applying Faraday's law to relate the induced EMF to the rate of change of magnetic flux. There is recognition of a misunderstanding regarding the problem's requirements, with suggestions to focus on the rate of change of the magnetic field instead of the final flux.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the change occurs over one second, and there is a discussion about the relevance of the initial magnetic field strength in the calculations.

wr1015
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
A conducting loop of wire has an area of 6.9 10-4 m2 and a resistance of 110[tex]\Omega[/tex] . Perpendicular to the plane of the loop is a magnetic field of strength 0.18 T. At what rate (in T/s) must this field change if the induced current in the loop is to be 0.18 A?

here's what I've done so far:

[tex]\theta[/tex] = 0

i used Ohm's Law V = IR to find V which is the same as EMF, which came out to be 19.8 V. Then to find initial flux i used [tex]\phi_{i}[/tex] = (.018T) (6.9 x 10[tex]^-4[/tex]) (cos 0) and got 1.242 x 10[tex]^-4[/tex]

this is where i think i might have gone wrong:

i'm assuming they are talking about a change over 1 second, so [tex]\Delta[/tex]t = 1s

and N = 1 since it originally says "A conducting loop of wire"

so i set up the Emf formula like this: 19.8 V = ([tex]\phi_{f}[/tex] - 1.242 x 10[tex]^-4[/tex]) and solved for [tex]\phi_{f}[/tex] and of course I'm not getting the right answer... any suggestions??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by writing Faraday's law, which relates induced EMF with the rate of change of the flux through the loop.
 
Doc Al said:
Start by writing Faraday's law, which relates induced EMF with the rate of change of the flux through the loop.
i did: 19.8 = 1 (([tex]\phi_{f}[/tex] - 1.242E-4)/(1))

[tex]\mid[/tex]E[tex]\mid[/tex] = 19.8 V
N = 1
[tex]\phi_{i}[/tex] = 1.242E-4 T
[tex]\Delta[/tex]t = 1s
 
Last edited:
anyone else?
 
wr1015 said:
i did: 19.8 = 1 (([tex]\phi_{f}[/tex] - 1.242E-4)/(1))

[tex]\mid[/tex]E[tex]\mid[/tex] = 19.8 V
N = 1
[tex]\phi_{i}[/tex] = 1.242E-4 T
[tex]\Delta[/tex]t = 1s

You are fiding the final flux but that`s not what they are asking. They want the rate of change of the magnetic field!
Use that [itex]{d \phi \over dt} = A cos \theta {d B \over dt}[/itex]. In your case cos theta = 1. Set this equal to the emf induced and dolve for dB/dt and see if you get the correct answer. As far as I can tell, the initial B field is not needed.

Patrick
 
nrqed said:
You are fiding the final flux but that`s not what they are asking. They want the rate of change of the magnetic field!
Use that [itex]{d \phi \over dt} = A cos \theta {d B \over dt}[/itex]. In your case cos theta = 1. Set this equal to the emf induced and dolve for dB/dt and see if you get the correct answer. As far as I can tell, the initial B field is not needed.

Patrick

ahh yes I don't why I thought finding the final flux was finding the rate of change :redface: thank you for clearing that up
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K