Kinematic Analysis: Solving the Challenge of Box Friction with a Smaller Object

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter unscientific
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Friction Kinematics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a large box on a frictionless surface and a smaller object placed on top of it, which is subjected to a force. Participants explore how to determine the conditions under which the smaller object moves in phase with the larger box, particularly focusing on the role of friction and energy transfer.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the problem is a trick question, noting that with zero friction, the larger box would not stop moving.
  • Another participant suggests that if the coefficient of friction is known, along with the masses and initial velocities, it is possible to calculate the distance the larger box has moved when the smaller object stops moving.
  • There is a discussion about the conditions under which the smaller object can move in phase with the larger box, emphasizing the importance of static and dynamic coefficients of friction.
  • One participant proposes using energy conservation principles to analyze the situation, suggesting that the energy lost by the smaller box due to friction is transferred to the larger box.
  • Another participant reiterates the need to develop equations that account for the deceleration of the smaller box and the acceleration of the larger box to achieve the same velocity.
  • There is mention of the energy method being more intuitive, although it can be complex to apply in this context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of friction and the feasibility of calculating the distance moved by the larger box. There is no consensus on the correct approach or solution to the problem, and multiple competing perspectives remain.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of various assumptions, such as the coefficients of friction and the initial conditions of the boxes. There are unresolved mathematical steps and dependencies on definitions that affect the discussion.

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13
Guys...im just a high school student and I am presented with a ' challenge ' by my physics teacher. I really hope to solve this by myself...but i hope you guys can give me tips on solving this problem..thnx

Imagine a big box on a surface with friction = 0 and a smaller object is thrown on top of with with a force denoted F. Can we calculate when will the smaller object move in phase with the bigger object? with regard with the distance traveled by the big box. ( in the sense that the smaller object stops moving??)

Thnx a lot.:rolleyes:


I mean that if there is a given velocity and everything is given, is there a way to find out how much distance the big box has moved when the small object on it stopped moving?


Is there any other simpler ways to solve it in terms of kinematics?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If friction is zero the big box won't ever stop moving. And there's no mention of relative masses or velocities, so maybe it's a trick question.
 
unscientific said:
I mean that if there is a given velocity and everything is given, is there a way to find out how much distance the big box has moved when the small object on it stopped moving?
If the co-efficient of friction between the big box and little box is known (in addition to the masses and initial velocities etc.), then yes it is possible.
 
Last edited:
Can we calculate when will the smaller object move in phase with the bigger object?

Is the small object (box) oscillating?

The boxes will move 'together' if the friction is sufficient to allow the big box to catch the smaller box. One has to look at the static and dynamic coefficients of friction.

The smaller box has to decelerate while the larger box has to accelerate - to the same velocity. One must develop the equation(s) for that.

In phase means the same velocity as a function of time, so force (F), static coefficient of friction and relative masses play a role.
 
im not sure i got this right...
the small box moves on top of the big box, and friction is applied.
the big box is at rest, and the small one has a starting velocity ?

if so, its easy to determin it by energy speculations...
we know that the friction causes a loss of velocity to the small box, and that energy must be trassfered to the big object (if we ignore heat and noise...).
so if we can determin the energy of the big box in the end of the process, when the small object stops moving on the big box, then we can determain the work made by the friction.

big box: mass- M V0b=0 Vb=the speed in the end of the process.
small box: mass:m v0s>0 Vs=the speed in the end of the process.

so the energy is being conserved by the equation:
0.5mV0s^2= 0.5mVs^2 + 0.5MVb^2
but we know that in the end of the process the small box stops moving on the big box, so in the end, Vs=Vb=V, therefor:
0.5mV0^2=0.5mV^2+0.5MV^2
V=sqrt(m/(M+m)) * V0s

so Eb=0.5MV^2
and we know that
Wfriction=fX=Eb
X=Eb/f

then:
X=0.5MV^2=(0.5mMV0s^2/f(M+m))

im very tierd so i might be wrong...
 
Astronuc said:
Is the small object (box) oscillating?

The boxes will move 'together' if the friction is sufficient to allow the big box to catch the smaller box. One has to look at the static and dynamic coefficients of friction.

The smaller box has to decelerate while the larger box has to accelerate - to the same velocity. One must develop the equation(s) for that.

In phase means the same velocity as a function of time, so force (F), static coefficient of friction and relative masses play a role.

energy method was developed to avoid such complication, though it much more cool and intuitive, its mindbreaking sometimes...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
24K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
8K