Intersect From Two Logarithmic Functions

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JDK
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Logarithmic
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the point of intersection between two logarithmic functions: y=log(base3)(x-1) +1 and y=log(base3)(2x +1). Participants explore methods to derive the intersection point, addressing both conceptual understanding and mathematical steps involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses frustration with understanding the problem and seeks help on how to approach finding the intersection point.
  • Another participant suggests starting by setting the two logarithmic expressions equal to each other, leading to the equation log(3x-3)=log(2x+1) and solving for x.
  • A different participant proposes naming the intersection point P and defining its coordinates as (a, b), leading to a system of equations that can be solved to find the intersection.
  • There is a realization that both equations must equal each other at the intersection point, which clarifies the approach for one participant.
  • One participant reflects on their cognitive overload from learning multiple programming languages alongside mathematics, suggesting it may be affecting their understanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the method of setting the equations equal to find the intersection point, but there is no consensus on the best approach or the specific steps to take, as different methods are proposed.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about their understanding and the steps required to solve the problem, indicating potential gaps in foundational knowledge or clarity on logarithmic functions.

Who May Find This Useful

Students struggling with logarithmic functions, those seeking to understand intersection points of graphs, or individuals balancing multiple subjects in their studies may find this discussion helpful.

JDK
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
It's funny because I've never had any problems with Math until I got to Pure Math 30. Now I feel like an idiot and have incredible urges to scream at my book as if it were listening. Please help me out here.

The graphs of y=log(base3)(x-1) +1 and y=log(base3)(2x +1) intersect at a point. An equation that could be used to find this point of intersections is...

Multiple Choice follows the Q. But, that's not what matters. I need some help on how to figure such a question out. I wish I could show some of my work to prove I've tried, but that's the thing - I'm blank right now. I don't know where to begin. I'd imagine one would combine the equations first like this...

y = log(base3)(x-1) + log(base3)(2x +1)

...and then work from there. Erghhh... take deep breaths... that's what I keep telling myself...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since we're talking about base 3, I won't write it.

You want to find x where

log(x-1) + 1=log(2x+1)

first 1=log(3). Using sum of logs=log of product, we get

log(3x-3)=log(2x+1)

3x-3=2x+1

x=4
 
The graphs of y=log(base3)(x-1) +1 and y=log(base3)(2x +1) intersect at a point. An equation that could be used to find this point of intersections is...

Let's move a step at a time.

You are looking for the coordinates for the point of intersection. We should give it a name to make it easier to refer to it; let's call it P. We are looking for its coordinates, so let's select variables to represent it's coordinates; how about a and b.

(I'm using a and b instead of x and y to illuminate the fact that these are conceptually different than the x and y given in the problem)

So we're looking for the coordinates of P, which are [itex](a, b)[/itex].

We know P lies on the graph of [itex]y = \log_3 (x-1) + 1[/itex]. Thus, its coordinates must satisfy the equation [itex]b = \log_3 (a-1) + 1[/itex].

We also know P lies on the graph of [itex]y = \log_3 (2x+1)[/itex]. Thus, its coordinates must satisfy the equation [itex]b = \log_3 (2a+1)[/itex].

So, we have this system of equations we wish to solve:

[tex] \begin{align}<br /> b &= \log_3 (a-1) + 1 \\<br /> b &= \log_3 (2a+1)<br /> \end{align}[/tex]

A common step to solve a system of equations is to solve one equation for one variable, and substitute the result in another equation. Here, both equations come pre-solved for b! So we take the solution from (1) and substitute into (2) to get

[tex]\log_3 (a-1) + 1 = \log_3 (2a+1)[/tex]

Which is the point where mathman started.
 
Last edited:
Great! I get it. Something in my brain just wasn't connecting properly (hasn't been for a while for some reason). The piece I was missing was that the two equations equal each other for the fact that they both have one single pair of values which satisfy one another and vice versa. Phew. Glad you guys helped out. The life of my textbook has been saved from my rage. Thanks!

I think I'm cramming to much in my head at once. I'm currently learning CSS, Javascript and Visual Basic and all my mathematical/logical decision making is getting mixed up. Maybe if I drop a language for a while I can focus better on what counts right now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K