The framework to the theory of everything

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a proposed framework for a theory of everything, which claims to connect concepts of gravitation, quantum theory, and relativity through the processes of mass evaporation, plasma, condensation, and evaporation. Participants express varying levels of interest and skepticism regarding the validity of these ideas.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant claims that mass evaporation creates space, time, and synchronization, suggesting a relationship between gravitation and quantum theory.
  • The same participant asserts that string theory is not valid and proposes that everything operates in three dimensions.
  • Another participant expresses strong disagreement with the initial claims, using dismissive language.
  • A subsequent reply challenges the dismissive stance, suggesting that negativity without substance is unproductive and calls for relevance in the discussion.
  • A later post references the initial dismissive response in a different language, indicating a need for explanation or clarification.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is clear disagreement among participants, with some expressing skepticism and others defending the proposed framework. The discussion remains unresolved with competing views present.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not provided detailed explanations or justifications for their positions, leading to a lack of clarity on the assumptions underlying the proposed framework and the criticisms raised.

C. Michael Turner
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Mass evaporated creating space, time, and sychronization. Plasma, condensation and evaporation three formes of gravitation explain the hidden relationship of quantum theory and reletivity. Anyone interested? send inquiry to Gravitation@cfl.rr.com and I'll send you the whole paper. "The Framework to the theory of everything" It shows everything works in three dimensions and string theory is pretend!
gravitation
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nepp

Nej, no, njet, nipp, nix, noop.
 
Unfortunately, negativity without substance seems to be your best quality. I'm looking for relevance not a cranial-rectal inversion.
 


Originally posted by Sariaht
Nej, no, njet, nipp, nix, noop.

hay que explicarlo.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K