Calculating Minimum Speed for a Bicycle Jump Across a Creek

  • Thread starter Thread starter Beretta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Carlos is attempting to calculate whether he can successfully jump a 7m wide creek using a ramp inclined at 10°. Traveling at a maximum speed of 40 km/h (11.11 m/s), he determines that he would only cover 4.4m in the air, indicating he should hit the brakes. To clear the creek, the minimum speed required is calculated to be 14.4 m/s. The discussion emphasizes the importance of significant figures in calculations and the correct application of gravitational acceleration in projectile motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of projectile motion principles
  • Basic knowledge of trigonometric functions (sine and cosine)
  • Familiarity with significant figures in scientific calculations
  • Knowledge of gravitational acceleration (9.81 m/s²)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of projectile motion in physics
  • Learn how to apply trigonometric functions in real-world scenarios
  • Research the significance of significant figures in scientific calculations
  • Explore advanced topics in kinematics and dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the mechanics of motion and the calculations involved in projectile trajectories.

Beretta
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Carlos is on his trail bike, approaching a creel bed that is 7m wide. A ramp with an incline of 10° has been built for daring people who try to jump the creek. Carlos is traveling at his bike’s maximum speed, 40km/h. a) Should Carlos attempt the jump or emphatically hit the brakes? b) What is the minimum speed a bike must have to make the jump? Assume equal elevations on either side of the creek.


Velocity = 40km/h = 11.11m/s

vx = v cos theta = 11.11m/s cos 10° =10.94m/s
vy = v sin theta = 11.11 m/s sin 10° = 1.93m/s
(Not sure for example here if I should consider significant figure on each calculation or only in the final answer)

a)
To obtain time Carlos spends in the air:
Y(t) = y0 + vy(t) -1/2(g)(t^2)
(Is it only when Y is positive upward and objects are falling downwards g should be negative?)
0m = 0m + 1.93t – (4.905m/s^2)
t(1,93m/s – (4,905m/s^2)t )

t = 0s and t =(1.93m/s)/(4.905m/s^2) = 0.40s (Again not sure if I should round or not)

To obtain distance:
X(t) = x0 + v0x(t)
X(t) = 10.94m/s(0.40s) = 4.4m and Carlos should hit the brakes!

b)
To calculate the minimum speed:
Vertical Time = 2v0y/g = 2v0 sin theta / g
And then I put time in the horizontal equation thus:
X(t) = x0 + v0x(t)
7m = 0m + v0x (2v0 sin theta / g)
7m = (v0 cos theta) (2v0 sin theta / g)
7m = (v0 cos 10) ((2v0 sin 10)/9.81)
7m = 2(v^2)(0,1666)/9,81
v^2 = 68.67/0.332 = 206.8(m/s)^2
v = 14.4m/s

Is my reasoning right? I’m really in need of your comments, and thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good to me. As for your specific questions:
"(Not sure for example here if I should consider significant figure on each calculation or only in the final answer)"
As a general rule, include one more figure in your calculations than you put in your answer. In this case, you are given, at best, 2 significant figures so you need 2 in your answer.

"(Is it only when Y is positive upward and objects are falling downwards g should be negative?)"
A coordinate system is something you impose on the problem yourself. What most people do- and I recommend- is take y to be positive upward (so "falling down" is negative) and g negative.

You calculated the distance Carlos will go before "touching down" again and found that it was less than the distance across the creek.
Okay, he shouldn't try it. I see no problem with your calculation.

You finally calculated the speed necessary so that horizontal dstance is at least 7 m. Once again, it looks good to me.

Finally, you calculated the minimum speed necessary to clear the creek and it was slightly MORE than Carlo's actual speed.
 
Thank you very much, I appreciate your comment.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K