Running Low on Supplies? What Should You Pick Up at the Store Tomorrow?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rach3
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread revolves around reminders and humorous exchanges among participants about personal tasks, grocery shopping, and the differences between antiseptics and antibiotics. It includes light-hearted banter about date formats and cultural differences in expressing time, as well as a few personal anecdotes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants humorously remind themselves of tasks, such as buying alcohol swabs and meat, while also discussing the importance of timing in food preparation and consumption.
  • A question is posed regarding the effectiveness of antiseptics versus antibiotics, with some participants attempting to clarify definitions and uses of each.
  • There are multiple exchanges about the confusion surrounding date formats, with participants expressing differing opinions on the logic of various systems (e.g., day-month-year vs. month-day-year).
  • Some participants suggest that using Julian dates could resolve issues related to date formatting across different cultures.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally engage in light-hearted banter and share personal reminders without reaching a consensus on the effectiveness of antiseptics versus antibiotics or the best date format. The discussion remains unresolved on these topics.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the clarity of definitions for antiseptics and antibiotics, as well as unresolved preferences regarding date formatting. The discussion reflects personal opinions and cultural differences without establishing a definitive stance.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in informal discussions about personal organization, cultural differences in date formats, and basic distinctions between antiseptics and antibiotics may find this thread engaging.

Rach3
Hey Rach3! This is you on 12/19, sending a message to the future version of yourself, as reminder.

1) It is reasonable to use a relatively blunt knife to deskin a salmon, if a nice sharp one is unavailable. Also, the consumption of moderate quantities of delicious sake is perfectly acceptable in social occasions. However, the chronology of events is rather important; it is best to slice your fish before consuming the sake.

2) When you stop by the store tomorrow, do pick up some alcohol swabs, will you? I seem to have run out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Mk! This is you on 12/19, sending a message to the future version of yourself, as reminder.

1) Although you should be working from when you wake up until eleven o'clock pm at least, stick in a few games of chess against the computer. Try not to write any music until eleven!

2) Don't forget to buy meat. You were all out except for a large uncooked ham today.
 
Mk, I too have a message for you: you missed the subtle irony of my post! Please do reread-it and enjoy a nice, expansive laugh. Preferably with sake and a first-aid kit.

-Rach3
 
Question for biologist members! What's the difference in effectiveness between "antiseptics" like isopropanol, and "antibiotics" like neosporin? Google doesn't help me here. Or maybe the ethanol (not isopropanol) is interfering with my capacity to utilize Google to the maximum extent possible.
 
An antibiotic is substance produce by microorganism that inhibit the growth or kill bacteria. Technically most of the current antibiotics are not produce by microorganism but are synthesized instead. However, there are still consider antibiotics because they are derived from antibiotics that are produce by microorganism.

An antiseptics is substance that inhibit the growth or kill of any type of microorganism that are on living tissue and skin.

The major differences are that an antibiotics is produced by a specific source, has a specific targeted group and can be used within a human with very little negative side effects

The problem is that people use the word antibiotics and antiseptics are bit to liberally.
 
Last edited:
:confused:

there's 19 months in a year?

:smile:
 
Anttech said:
:confused:

there's 19 months in a year?

:smile:
It's a long year. :smile:
 
I don't even remember half of this year, it went so fast.
 
didn't they mean to say 19/12?
 
  • #10
Anttech said:
:confused:

there's 19 months in a year?

:smile:

Silly Europeans. :rolleyes: You'd probably be confused if I told you Rach3 was 6"5' tall.

What are you guys going to do when 10/11/12 rolls around?
 
  • #11
BobG said:
Silly Europeans. :rolleyes: You'd probably be confused if I told you Rach3 was 6"5' tall.

What are you guys going to do when 10/11/12 rolls around?

you mean 11/10/12?

Now I am confussed :smile:

This is exactly why I always write the date:

Day-Month-Year --> 19-Dec-2006

As for the 6"5' How many hands & chains is that?

Get with 00's hehe :smile:
 
  • #12
Well our (European) system is most logical as we write our dates in ascending chronological order so the most important information (i.e. the bit that changes most often) is displayed first.

I believe you've had too much sake when you slice off part of your thumb and still believe its salmon.

EDIT: Oh yeah and 1 billion = 1 000 000 000 000 :biggrin:
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Rach3 said:
Hey Rach3! This is you on 12/19, sending a message to the future version of yourself, as reminder.

1) It is reasonable to use a relatively blunt knife to deskin a salmon, if a nice sharp one is unavailable. Also, the consumption of moderate quantities of delicious sake is perfectly acceptable in social occasions. However, the chronology of events is rather important; it is best to slice your fish before consuming the sake.

2) When you stop by the store tomorrow, do pick up some alcohol swabs, will you? I seem to have run out.
Wouldn't it be more effective if you sent the message to a previous version of yourself? I have committed a few howlers that I would love to be able to warn myself about.
 
  • #14
Kurdt said:
Well our (European) system is most logical as we write our dates in ascending chronological order so the most important information (i.e. the bit that changes most often) is displayed first.
If you wrote it year (4 digits), month, date, then it would sort correctly.
 
  • #15
What do you mean 'sort correctly'? Yes that has a logic to it but what people are interested in is the day. You can see this through speech patterns that have developed, because people say for example "the 16th of November 1993". Although saying that Americans would say "November 16th 1993". which is odd to me.

Anyway apologies for hijacking thread actions. :blushing:
 
  • #16
Kurdt said:
What do you mean 'sort correctly'? Yes that has a logic to it but what people are interested in is the day. You can see this through speech patterns that have developed, because people say for example "the 16th of November 1993". Although saying that Americans would say "November 16th 1993". which is odd to me.
Americans say "November 16th, 1993."

I normally do it in order by size.
 
  • #17
Kurdt said:
What do you mean 'sort correctly'?
2004/12/15 < 2005/11/09 < 2006/10/13
where < stands for sort order and dates are (yyyy/mm/dd). So sort order is the same as chronological order. But
09/11/2005 < 13/10/2006 < 15/12/2004. So sort order is different from chronological order.
 
  • #18
jimmysnyder said:
2004/12/15 < 2005/11/09 < 2006/10/13
where < stands for sort order and dates are (yyyy/mm/dd). So sort order is the same as chronological order. But
09/11/2005 < 13/10/2006 < 15/12/2004. So sort order is different from chronological order.

Ah fair enough. That way is more logical for certain applications. :smile:
 
  • #19
Hey Moose! This is you now (check the postmark)
1) Good luck on your final tomorrow!
 
  • #20
Hey Cyclovenom!:

1) Remember to shake your head and smile...
 
  • #21
jimmysnyder said:
2004/12/15 < 2005/11/09 < 2006/10/13
where < stands for sort order and dates are (yyyy/mm/dd). So sort order is the same as chronological order. But
09/11/2005 < 13/10/2006 < 15/12/2004. So sort order is different from chronological order.

Why wouldn't you just store all dates as Julian dates? Then you could handle the display part differently depending upon user preference?

For example, seeing as how it's December 20, 2006, 16:00:00 UST, the Julian date would be 2454090.16667. That allows the date and time to sort regardless of the display format.

Hmm. When you think about it, if we'd use Julian dates for everything we wouldn't have the problem of different regions having different habits for displaying the date and time.
 
  • #22
moose said:
Hey Moose! This is you now (check the postmark)
1) Good luck on your final tomorrow!

OMG, I forgot about this thread. I freakin owned that final.
 
  • #23
LMAO, awesome moose!