Thermodynamics unified with QM?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jrrship
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qm Thermodynamics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between thermodynamics and quantum mechanics (QM), particularly exploring whether they can be unified. Participants also inquire about the concept of time's arrow in relation to QM, special relativity (SR), general relativity (GR), string theory (ST), and loop quantum gravity (LQG).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if thermodynamics has been unified with QM, suggesting that thermodynamics arises from quantum-level interactions.
  • Another participant argues that classical thermodynamics is a statistical description of many particles' interactions and does not require unification with QM, as the interactions at the microscopic scale are well understood.
  • A participant seeks explanations for time's arrow and entropy within QM, SR, GR, ST, or LQG, questioning if the concept of entropy is merely accepted without deeper understanding.
  • Another participant references statistical mechanics, explaining that the increase of entropy is associated with a transition from low-probability to high-probability states, using the example of gas particles in a box.
  • Further inquiry is made about why the spreading of gas or dye is considered the most probable outcome, seeking to understand the underlying mechanisms behind these probabilistic behaviors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between thermodynamics and QM, with some asserting that no unification is necessary while others explore the implications of quantum interactions. The discussion on time's arrow and entropy remains unresolved, with multiple perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding assumptions about the nature of entropy and the mechanisms behind probabilistic outcomes, which are not fully explored or agreed upon.

jrrship
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
has thermodyamics been unified with QM?

i thought that thermodyanimcs arises because of things that happen on the quantum level.

for instance, as time's arrow been unified with QM or SR or GR? What does ST or LQG say about time's arrow?
 
Science news on Phys.org
jrrship said:
has thermodyamics been unified with QM?

i thought that thermodyanimcs arises because of things that happen on the quantum level.

for instance, as time's arrow been unified with QM or SR or GR? What does ST or LQG say about time's arrow?

Er... back off a bit here.

Classical thermodynamics is a statistical description of the interactions of many particles. So it is nothing more than EM interaction, but done over a gazillion particles. There is nothing to "unite" it with.

One can do the same with invoking QM into thermodynamic (often done in solid state/condensed matter physics that deal with such huge numbers). Again, there is nothing to "unite" because it is well-known what the interactions are at the microscopic scale.

Zz.
 
Is there some explanation for time's arrow and entropy in QM, in SR, GR, ST, or LQG?

Or are we just saying "entropy happens."

Thanks!
 
I think you may be pining for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_mechanics" . AFAIRemember, the increase of entropy is explained as a movement from a low-probability state to a higher-probability state.

So imagine a gas in a box, and think about the positions and momenta of all the particles at any given moment - this is a certain state, a point in a hugely-dimensional 'phase space', and the point wanders around exploring this phase space in a seemingly random walk. Within the phase space, there's a tiny volume corresponding to having all the particles in one half of the box, and a huge volume corresponding to having the particles evenly distributed throughout the entire box.

So if the box starts off partitioned, with all of the gas in one half, and we then release the partition, the gas spreads out because that's the overwhelmingly most probable thing for it to do.

hope that helps
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nancarrow said:
I think you may be pining for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_mechanics" . AFAIRemember, the increase of entropy is explained as a movement from a low-probability state to a higher-probability state.

So imagine a gas in a box, and think about the positions and momenta of all the particles at any given moment - this is a certain state, a point in a hugely-dimensional 'phase space', and the point wanders around exploring this phase space in a seemingly random walk. Within the phase space, there's a tiny volume corresponding to having all the particles in one half of the box, and a huge volume corresponding to having the particles evenly distributed throughout the entire box.

So if the box starts off partitioned, with all of the gas in one half, and we then release the partition, the gas spreads out because that's the overwhelmingly most probable thing for it to do.

hope that helps


But why is it the most probable thing for the gas to do?

Why is it the most probable thing, for a drop of dye in a swimming pool to spread out?

What is the underlying mechanism that causes this?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
532
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K