Deriving Distance Change from Newton's Law of Gravity

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Izzhov
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on deriving a function for the change in distance between two masses under the influence of Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation, specifically as a function of time. Participants explore the necessary equations and concepts involved in this derivation, including the role of differential equations and the conditions of the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation must be used alongside Newton's Second Law of Motion to derive the required function.
  • Another participant mentions the need for two coupled differential equations to describe the motion of the masses, suggesting that solving these will yield how the distance varies with time.
  • A participant expresses confusion about solving differential equations and requests a straightforward answer.
  • One reply indicates that there are three possible motions for one mass around another, depending on energy and angular momentum, but does not provide a direct solution to the original question.
  • Another participant clarifies that they are interested in the distance covered by two masses at rest due to their gravitational attraction, rather than their motion around each other.
  • Several participants emphasize that solving the problem requires calculus, specifically differential equations, and express that the problem cannot be resolved without this mathematical framework.
  • A participant proposes a specific equation relating velocity as a function of distance and time, seeking validation of its correctness.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that calculus and differential equations are necessary to solve the problem, but there is no consensus on how to approach the derivation or the specific details of the solution. Confusion and differing interpretations of the original question persist.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with calculus and differential equations, which may affect their ability to engage with the mathematical aspects of the discussion. The discussion also highlights assumptions about the initial conditions of the masses and the forces acting on them.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in gravitational physics, mathematical modeling of motion, and those exploring the application of calculus to physical problems.

Izzhov
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation states that: [tex]F_g = G \frac{m_1 m_2}{r^2}[/tex]. My question is this: How can this law be used to derive a function for the change in distance between two masses ([tex]m_1[/tex] and [tex]m_2[/tex]) a distance r apart as a function of time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation, no matter how many capitals you put in there, is pretty useless when not accompanied by Newton's Second Law of Motion:

[tex]\vec{F}=m\frac{d^2\vec{r}}{dt^2}[/tex]

Actually, two equations of motion are necessary for this problem: one of each mass.

[tex]-G\frac{m_1 m_2}{|\vec{r}_1-\vec{r}_2|^3}(\vec{r}_1-\vec{r}_2)=m_1\frac{d^2\vec{r}_1}{dt^2}[/tex]

[tex]G\frac{m_1 m_2}{|\vec{r}_1-\vec{r}_2|^3}(\vec{r}_1-\vec{r}_2)=m_2\frac{d^2\vec{r}_2}{dt^2}[/tex]

These are two coupled differential equations, but see what you get by substracting the second fromt he first: One ordinary differential equation for [itex]\vec{r}[/itex], the vector going from m1 to m2. Its norm is precisely r, the distance btw m1 and m2, and solving the equation tells you how r varies with time.
 
Last edited:
You have forgotten unit vectors, dearest!
 
Brilliant! There are only two problems: I have no idea how to solve differential equations, and I don't really have any idea what you're talking about.

Do you think you could just tell me the answer?
 
Last edited:
Well I've answered your question from post #1, now you want me to solve the problem and tell you the answer? What is this about anyway? I suppose it's not for a homework, so why do you want to know?

It's complicated, but it turns out that there are 3 possible motions for m1 around m2 depending on the total energy and angular momentum: an ellipse (of which a circle is a special case), a parabola and an hyperbola. You can find plenty of information on this on the web. See for instance http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-body_problem#Application_to_inverse-square_force_laws.
 
Last edited:
First of all, this isn't a homework; it's a question I thought of in my free time (I'm in 9th grade; I don't think you learn differential equations until you're slightly older than that). Secondly, I didn't mean the circular/elliptical motion of a mass moving with a tangential speed around another mass, I meant the distance covered by two masses, just sitting there, motionless, in space, when the only force affecting them is their gravitational force on each other.
 
Okay, so you are basically wanting to use the equation to derive when they hit each other?
 
Unfortunately, the answer to your original question is "solve the differential equation you get by putting the gravitational force into
[tex]F= ma= \frac{d^2x}{dt^2}. The problem simply cannot be done without at least some calculus. In fact, that's why calculus had to be invented![/tex]
 
Newton used Euclid in Principia, I think.
(But he probably "cheated" in his work room using his fluxions instead..)
 
  • #10
arildno said:
Okay, so you are basically wanting to use the equation to derive when they hit each other?

Kind of, except I want it to be assumed that both bodies are starting at rest, and that the only force acting on them is their gravitational force on each other. Also, I want the equation to tell how much distance is covered between them over a time t, not just when they collide.

HallsofIvy said:
Unfortunately, the answer to your original question is "solve the differential equation you get by putting the gravitational force into
[tex]F= ma= \frac{d^2x}{dt^2}. The problem simply cannot be done without at least some calculus. In fact, that's why calculus had to be invented![/tex]
[tex] <br /> Well, I do know some calculus, just not differential equations or vectors. <br /> All I really know are the basic principles of differentiation and integration. Is there any chance it can be put in a way I would understand, with only some basic knowledge of calculus?[/tex]
 
  • #11
I think I've found the solution to my problem. In order to know whether it's right, however, I need to know whether this is true: [tex]\frac{ \partial v(d)}{ \partial d} = \frac{1}{t}[/tex]

In this equation, v(d) is velocity as a function of distance, d is distance, and t is time. So, is this equation true?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K