Can Magnetic Fluid Spacecraft Revolutionize Space Travel?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of magnetic fluid spacecraft, exploring their potential advantages and disadvantages compared to conventional solid metallic spacecraft. Participants examine theoretical applications, material properties, and the implications for space travel.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that magnetic fluid spacecraft could absorb high-velocity space debris more effectively than traditional designs.
  • Others suggest that these spacecraft could change shape to adapt to different atmospheric conditions or requirements for shuttlecraft.
  • There are claims that magnetic fluid spacecraft could withstand internal stresses better than solid materials.
  • Magnetic levitation is mentioned as a potential method to assist in flight.
  • Some participants note that a naturally generated radio signal could help locate these spacecraft.
  • It is suggested that electrical power could be generated through external charge flux.
  • One participant argues that initial construction costs might be lower than those of conventional spacecraft.
  • Concerns are raised about the feasibility of maintaining a liquid state in varying temperatures and radiation conditions in space.
  • Some participants question the need for a permanent power supply and the implications of power failures.
  • There are discussions about the potential for magnetic fluids to interfere with radio waves.
  • Participants mention the concept of self-organizing nanite technology as a possible future development related to magnetic fluid spacecraft.
  • Electrorheological fluids are introduced as an alternative to magnetorheological fluids, which could also change viscosity under different conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of fascination and skepticism regarding the practicality of magnetic fluid spacecraft. While some acknowledge potential advantages, others highlight significant challenges and uncertainties, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations regarding the control of magnetic fluids, the need for a power supply, and the effects of environmental conditions on the spacecraft's materials. There are also unresolved questions about the technology's feasibility and implications for spacecraft design.

Loren Booda
Messages
3,115
Reaction score
4
A spacecraft whose bulk consists of magnetic fluid shaped by an internal magnetic field has several advantages over conventional solid metallic craft.

1. It would better be able to absorb high-velocity space debris.

2. It could change shape to the demands of atmospheric viscosity or for the constrution of shuttlecraft.

3. It could more readily withstand internal stresses.

4. Magnetic levitation could be utilized to assist in its flight.

5. A naturally generated radio signal locates it.

6. Its electrical power is generated through external charge flux.

7. Its intial construction would incur less cost than that of conventional spaceships.

A magnetic fluid craft might have to bypass strong magneto fields of planets and stars, but these could also be exploited for its efficient propulsion. It may have to be constructed in outer space to avoid large gravitational and inertial forces.

Can you foresee any other advantages/disadvantages of magnetic fluid spaceships?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My mind doesn't opperate on the level. All I can say is that it sounds like a very useful idea (one day, that is.)
 
In all my days of dreaming up wacky sci-fi ideas I’ve never seen or even considered the concept of a magnetic fluid spacecraft . When you say “Magnetic Fluid” what type of material are you talking about?
 
For the low-temperature application involved, I'd say tentatively mercury, or iron suspended in a hydrocarbon or fluorocarbon by appropriate surfactant.
 
Originally posted by Loren Booda
A spacecraft whose bulk consists of magnetic fluid shaped by an internal magnetic field...

?
I've NEVER heard of that technology.
What is it ?

"Does dice play God ?"

Live long and prosper.
 
Remember, drag, you heard it here first.

Ferrofluids are a colloidal suspension of nanoscale ferrites that retain their liquid identity yet obey a magnetic field. Your stereo speakers may well utilize them near the voice coil to lessen field losses and dampen resonances.
 
Can magnetic fluids intercept any radio waves or something?
 
Originally posted by Loren Booda
Can you foresee any... disadvantages of magnetic fluid spaceships?

Yes, they kidnap little boys and make them travel through time.
Honestly, have we learned nothing from the movie Flight of the Navigator?

eNtRopY
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Surprisingly, this is the first thing I've ever seen you post that seemed, well...sort of nuts. I'm pretty sure (well actaully I'm just guessing) that any specialist in fluid dynamics would feel that trying to control a fluid like that would be impossible with our current knowledge and control of physics.

That said, the idea of a ferro fluid to absorb impact seems not unreasonable. There is also work be done on self organising nanite technology which could potentially create a 'fluid' ship in the future.

By the way, you can make a ferrofluid yourself check down the bottom of this page.

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2002/23aug_MRfluids.htm

Raavin
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Originally posted by Raavin
There is also work be done on self organising nanite technology which could potentially create a 'fluid' ship in the future.

Are you referring to memory metals?

eNtRopY
 
  • #11
Greetings !

Well, I'm still not entirely certain about this.
But I will address your "uses" points :
Originally posted by Loren Booda
A spacecraft whose bulk consists of magnetic fluid shaped by an internal magnetic field has several advantages over conventional solid metallic craft.

1. It would better be able to absorb high-velocity space debris.

2. It could change shape to the demands of atmospheric viscosity or for the constrution of shuttlecraft.

3. It could more readily withstand internal stresses.

4. Magnetic levitation could be utilized to assist in its flight.

5. A naturally generated radio signal locates it.

6. Its electrical power is generated through external charge flux.

7. Its intial construction would incur less cost than that of conventional spaceships.

A magnetic fluid craft might have to bypass strong magneto fields of planets and stars, but these could also be exploited for its efficient propulsion. It may have to be constructed in outer space to avoid large gravitational and inertial forces.

Can you foresee any other advantages/disadvantages of magnetic fluid spaceships?
1. Possible.
2. Fascinating !
3. And what if there's a power glitch ? :smile:
4. Magnetic levitation ? You need something
to cause the levitation. Or, in simpler Newtonian
terms - something to push against.
5. I don't follow this ?
6. And that is some advantage ?
7. Indeed.

Possible disadvantages :
1. First of all, can something like this remain in "liquid"
state in space in different tempratures and radiation
conditions ?
2. It requires a permanent power supply !
Including the construction stage (of additional "internal"
stuff, not made from this material).
3. basically, metal - a material that if strongly effected
by EM fields and radiation is simply a bad choice
for a spacecraft 's hull.
4. The construction must take place in micro-gravity.
5. Can't it rust ?

"Does dice play God ?"

Live long and prosper.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Are you referring to memory metals?

No, I can't find it again at the moment but I'm talking about little robots that join together in different shapes. I think I might have seen it on a documentary. I think each one is quite large at the moment. Not really nanites.

Just had a look, check this out

http://www2.parc.com/spl/projects/modrobots/chain/polybot/

Have a proper look through the site like this bit on digital clay

http://www2.parc.com/spl/projects/modrobots/lattice/digitalclay/index.html

Heaps o'stuff

Raavin
 
  • #13
Also search for electrorheological fluids which are electrically forced to change in viscocity rather than magnetorheological fluids which do the same magnetically.

Raavin
 
  • #14
drag-

Re: Magnetic fluid spacecraft
Greetings !

Well, I'm still not entirely certain about this.
But I will address your "uses" points :


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Loren Booda
A spacecraft whose bulk consists of magnetic fluid shaped by an internal magnetic field has several advantages over conventional solid metallic craft.

1. It would better be able to absorb high-velocity space debris.

2. It could change shape to the demands of atmospheric viscosity or for the constrution of shuttlecraft.

3. It could more readily withstand internal stresses.

4. Magnetic levitation could be utilized to assist in its flight.

5. A naturally generated radio signal locates it.

6. Its electrical power is generated through external charge flux.

7. Its intial construction would incur less cost than that of conventional spaceships.

A magnetic fluid craft might have to bypass strong magneto fields of planets and stars, but these could also be exploited for its efficient propulsion. It may have to be constructed in outer space to avoid large gravitational and inertial forces.

Can you foresee any other advantages/disadvantages of magnetic fluid spaceships?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


1. Possible.
2. Fascinating !
3. And what if there's a power glitch ?
4. Magnetic levitation ? You need something
to cause the levitation. Or, in simpler Newtonian
terms - something to push against.
5. I don't follow this ?
6. And that is some advantage ?
7. Indeed.

Possible disadvantages :
1. First of all, can something like this remain in "liquid"
state in space in different tempratures and radiation
conditions ?
2. It requires a permanent power supply !
Including the construction stage (of additional "internal"
stuff, not made from this material).
3. basically, metal - a material that if strongly effected
by EM fields and radiation is simply a bad choice
for a spacecraft 's hull.
4. The construction must take place in micro-gravity.
5. Can't it rust ?

"Does dice play God ?"

Live long and prosper.
Power would be generated by "skin effect," the potential which develops from collision with ions, or by internal nuclear reactor.

Levitation would be used in conjunction with bodies having a large magnetic field.

The skin effect would create a signature E-M signal, as would the interaction of the craft with external magnetic fields.

Energy for "free" would be generated by the above skin effect.

Temperature must be maintained for a liquid state in 2.73K space, or >1000K space near stars.

Rust, or oxidation, does not readily occur in the vacuum of space.
 
  • #15
That sounds pretty interesting, but I'm rather curious how you would go about making the fluid conform to an exact form. Perhaps you could use some sort of wire frame, or maybe there is a wireless way of creating a magnetic field that conforms to aerodynamics and such.

Like, if the ship is to be shaped like a classic airplane, how would one design the em fields to regulate the curves and such? Also, how would it be able to switch forms?

I could see if some type of flexible conductor was used to spread the magnetic field as needed. Could possibly even have the conductor setup to slide at certain points, but I dunno.

Sounds pretty cool, maybe we should try a skateboard first though.
 
  • #16
Thanks for the ref, sir-pinski. Someone beat me to it. It might indeed be difficult to shape arbitrarily using internal magnetic fields. I will put on my magnetic thinking-cap.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
90
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K