Calculating Moment of Inertia for Sierpinski Triangle - Tips and Tricks

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter climbhi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fractal Moment
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the moment of inertia for a Sierpinski triangle about an axis through its center and perpendicular to the triangle. Participants explore various approaches, including symmetry arguments, self-similarity, and the implications of the fractal's properties on mass distribution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how to approach the problem, initially considering symmetry arguments but later doubting their validity.
  • Another participant suggests that the Sierpinski triangle has infinite mass density due to its zero volume and proposes using a self-similarity argument to relate the moment of inertia of the whole triangle to its individual parts.
  • A detailed mathematical approach is presented, where one participant calculates the moment of inertia for one section of the fractal and applies the parallel-axis theorem to derive a formula for the moment of inertia of the entire structure.
  • The calculations involve scaling factors and mass distribution, leading to a proposed formula for the moment of inertia in terms of the mass and length of the triangle.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method to calculate the moment of inertia, with differing views on the implications of the fractal's properties and the validity of the proposed approaches.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the treatment of mass and density in the context of fractals, as well as the geometric reasoning needed for some calculations.

climbhi
Okay this problem sounded neat, but I'm stuck on it. How would one go about finding the moment of inertia of Sierpinski's triangle about an axis through its center and perpindicular to the triangle? Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's a http://physics.harvard.edu/undergrad/prob9.pdf to the problem so you can see what I'm talking about. This ones really throwing me for a loop. I thought maybe that you could use a symetry argument and say that it would be the same as for a regular triangle just with a smaller mass. But rethinking that I'm pretty sure its wrong. Then I thought that if you did what the problem statement described down to infinity you wouldn't have any mass left at the end which would make the moment zero. But again this seems wrong to me. This is really beginning to bother me. Can anyone help me out?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, part of the trick is that the object has infinite mass density (because of the zero volume).

I think you need to use a self-similarity argument to find the moment of the whole in terms of the moment of the individual parts, and coupled with the scale factor should yield a system you can solve.

Hurkyl
 
Okay, you lost me there...
 
Let I be the moment of inertia around the center of the fractal.

Consider now just one section of the fractal. One section has one third of the mass and is scaled down by a factor of two, so the moment of inertia of one section about its center is (I / 12); multiply by one third because of the mass change, and by one half squared because of the scaling.

By the parallel-axis theorem, to find the moment of inertia of one section about the center of the whole fractal, we add the mass of the section times the square of the distance between the axes. The mass of the section is (m / 3) because it's one third of the whole. The distance between the axes is (insert some geometrical reasoning) one third of the height which is (sqrt(3) / 2) * l, so the distance is l / (2 sqrt(3)), so the moment of inertia of one section is

(I / 12) + (m / 3) * (l / (2 sqrt(3))^2
= (I / 12) + (m / 3) * l^2 / 12
= (I / 12) + m l^2 / 36

The moment of inertia of the whole should be the sum of the moments of inertia of the three sections, so:

I = 3 * ((I / 12) + m l^2 / 36)
= I / 4 + m l^2 / 12

3 I / 4 = m l^2 / 12
I = m l^2 / 9
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 138 ·
5
Replies
138
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
15K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K